David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Geography 5 (1):69 – 81 (2002)
In previous work we have described the nature of geologic reasoning and the relation between the geological observer and the outcrop which is the object of their study. We now turn to further consideration of the epistemological aspects of geology that have been largely neglected by twentieth century epistemology. Our basic claim is that the experiential facts of geological field work do not fit with a philosophy of science that has evolved out of considerations on the laboratory sciences. Shifting our focus from the lab to the field offers a more embodied, historical, and fallibilistic understanding of geology.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tom Rockmore (2011). Kant and Phenomenology. University of Chicago Press.
Miriam Solomon (1992). Scientific Rationality and Human Reasoning. Philosophy of Science 59 (3):439-455.
D. S. (2001). Of Stones, Men and Angels: The Competing Myth of Isabelle Duncan's Pre-Adamite Man (1860). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (1):59-104.
J. David Archibald (2009). Edward Hitchcock's Pre-Darwinian (1840) "Tree of Life". Journal of the History of Biology 42 (3):561 - 592.
Charles Darwin (1987). Charles Darwin's Notebooks, 1836-1844: Geology, Transmutation of Species, Metaphysical Enquiries. Cornell University Press.
Rachel Bush (1971). Towards a History of Geology: Proceedings of the New Hampshire Inter-Disciplinary Conference on the History of Geology, September 7–12, 1967. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2 (2):176-182.
Derek D. Turner (2007). Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Scientific Realism Debate. Cambridge University Press.
David Oldroyd (1999). Non-Written Sources in the Study of the History of Geology: Pros and Cons, in the Light of the Views of Collingwood and Foucault. Annals of Science 56 (4):395-415.
Richard A. Watson (1966). Is Geology Different: A Critical Discussion of "the Fabric of Geology". Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):172-.
Added to index2009-02-04
Total downloads48 ( #37,316 of 1,102,053 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #24,850 of 1,102,053 )
How can I increase my downloads?