Journal of Philosophical Logic (forthcoming)
|Abstract||The semantic paradoxes are often associated with self-reference or referential circularity. Yablo (1993), however, has shown that there are infinitary versions of the paradoxes that do not involve this form of circularity. It remains an open question what relations of reference between collections of sentences afford the structure necessary for paradoxicality. In this essay, we lay the groundwork for a general investigation into the nature of reference structures that support the semantic paradoxes and the semantic hypodoxes. We develop a functionally complete infinitary propositional language endowed with a denotation assignment and extract the reference structural information in terms of graph-theoretic properties. We introduce the new concepts of dangerous and precarious reference graphs, which allows us to rigorously define the task: classify the dangerous and precarious directed graphs purely in terms of their graph-theoretic properties. Ungroundedness will be shown to fully characterize the precarious reference graphs and fully characterize the dangerous finite graphs. We prove that an undirected graph has a dangerous orientation if and only if it contains a cycle, providing some support for the traditional idea that cyclic structure is required for paradoxicality. This leaves the task of classifying danger for infinite acyclic reference graphs. We provide some compactness results, which give further necessary conditions on danger in infinite graphs, which in conjunction with a notion of self-containment allows us to prove that dangerous acyclic graphs must have infinitely many vertices with infinite out-degree. But a full characterization of danger remains an open question. In the appendices we relate our results to the results given in Cook (2004) and Yablo (2006) with respect to more restricted sentences systems, which we call F-systems.|
|Keywords||Paradox Reference structure Yablo's paradox Liar paradox Graph theory Circularity self-reference Danger Kernel Yablo|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
O. Bueno & M. Colyvan (2003). Yablo's Paradox and Referring to Infinite Objects. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):402 – 412.
Roy A. Sorensen (1998). Yablo's Paradox and Kindred Infinite Liars. Mind 107 (425):137-155.
Ming Hsiung (2013). Equiparadoxicality of Yablo's Paradox and the Liar. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22 (1):23-31.
P. Schlenker (2007). The Elimination of Self-Reference: Generalized Yablo-Series and the Theory of Truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (3):251 - 307.
Nicholas J. J. Smith (2000). The Principle of Uniform Solution (of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference). Mind 109 (433):117-122.
Keith Simmons (2005). A Berry and a Russell Without Self-Reference. Philosophical Studies 126 (2):253 - 261.
Philippe Schlenker (2007). How to Eliminate Self-Reference: A Précis. Synthese 158 (1):127 - 138.
J. C. E. Dekker (1981). Twilight Graphs. Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (3):539-571.
Zbigniew Tworak (2008). Samoodniesienie a zagadnienie powstawania antynomii. Filozofia Nauki 2.
Stephen Yablo (2004). Circularity and Paradox. In Thomas Bolander, Vincent F. Hendricks & Stig Andur Pedersen (eds.), Self-Reference. Csli Publications.
Greg Restall (2007). Curry's Revenge: The Costs of Non-Classical Solutions to the Paradoxes of Self-Reference. In J. C. Beall (ed.), Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Jordi Valor Abad (2008). The Inclosure Scheme and the Solution to the Paradoxes of Self-Reference. Synthese 160 (2):183 - 202.
Timothy Williamson (2000). Semantic Paradox and Semantic Change. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:113-124.
Jon Barwise (1987). The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2012-06-28
Total downloads43 ( #26,191 of 549,124 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,263 of 549,124 )
How can I increase my downloads?