Lyin' t(*)gers, and 'cares' oh my: The case for feminist integration of business ethics [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 16 (3):247 - 261 (1997)
In this re-visioning, business ethics would integrate feminist theories and pedagogy which include the diversity of women in terms of race/ethnicity, class and sexual orientation, thereby expanding its coverage to include issues of power, gender, cultural and theoretical conceptualizations, both in the conceptualization of morality, as well as in ethical constructs of analysis. My research indicates that the integration of feminist scholarship, ethics and pedagogy would make it possible to teach ethical decision making, and ultimately increase the likelihood of ethical behavior, by showing students how to harness the multi-cultural ways of thinking needed to resolve ever more complex organizational problems.Use of the four-stage model I propose would effectively address the three major issues which make teaching business ethics in a new way to critical. The curricula, as modified, would present enriched ethical theories which are contextual and grounded in experience and which grant the connected nature of all organizational stakeholders. By recreating personal identity, autonomy and power as a theories of community, teaching its responsible use would be easier. Expanding the definition of business ethics to include authenticity and mutuality would move it beyond "social responsibility" to a model of interrelationship which encourage principled thinking leading to more ethical behavior. By combing empirically connected ethical theories, and conflict resolution techniques, ethical precepts can be molded into more usable curriculum models.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jun Gu & Cristina Neesham (forthcoming). Moral Identity as Leverage Point in Teaching Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics.
Similar books and articles
Mark C. Baetz & David J. Sharp (2004). Integrating Ethics Content Into the Core Business Curriculum: Do Core Teaching Materials Do the Job? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 51 (1):53-62.
Elizabeth Vallance (1995). Business Ethics at Work. Cambridge University Press.
Chris Robertson & Paul A. Fadil (1999). Ethical Decision Making in Multinational Organizations: A Culture-Based Model. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 19 (4):385 - 392.
William Arthur Wines (2008). Seven Pillars of Business Ethics: Toward a Comprehensive Framework. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 79 (4):483 - 499.
Robbin Derry & Ronald M. Green (1989). Ethical Theory in Business Ethics: A Critical Assessment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7):521 - 533.
Frida Kerner Furman (1990). Teaching Business Ethics: Questioning the Assumptions, Seeking New Directions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 9 (1):31 - 38.
Gael M. McDonald (2005). A Case Example: Integrating Ethics Into the Academic Business Curriculum. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 54 (4):371 - 384.
Kenneth M. Hiltebeitel & Scott K. Jones (1992). An Assessment of Ethics Instruction in Accounting Education. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (1):37 - 46.
Alfonso R. Oddo (1997). A Framework for Teaching Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (3):293-297.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #272,517 of 1,140,280 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #142,694 of 1,140,280 )
How can I increase my downloads?