Graduate studies at Western
Glasshouse Press (2003)
|Abstract||This new book argues that at the core of legal philosophy’s principal debates there is essentially one issue judicial impartiality. Keeping this issue to the forefront,Raban’s approach sheds much light on many difficult and seemingly perplexing jurisprudential debates. Modern Legal Theory and Judicial Impartiality.|
|Keywords||Law Philosophy Jurisprudence Judicial ethics Justice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$72.39 new $76.16 used Amazon page|
|Call number||K230.R328.A37 2003|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lawrence B. Solum (2005). The Aretaic Turn in Constitutional Theory. Brooklyn Law Review 70:475.
Steven J. Burton (1992). Judging in Good Faith. Cambridge University Press.
Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov (2011). The Figuring of Morality in Adjudication: Not so Special? Ratio Juris 24 (3):284-303.
John Thomas Noonan & Kenneth I. Winston (eds.) (1993). The Responsible Judge: Readings in Judicial Ethics. Praeger.
Barbara Baum Levenbook (1984). On Universal Relevance in Legal Reasoning. Law and Philosophy 3 (1):1 - 23.
Thom Brooks (2004). The Right to Trial by Jury. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):197–212.
Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (2010). Limits of Legality: The Ethics of Lawless Judging. Oxford University Press.
Lawrence B. Solum (2003). Virtue Jurisprudence a Virtue–Centred Theory of Judging. Metaphilosophy 34 (1/2):178--213.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #74,582 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?