Modern Legal Theory and Judicial Impartiality
Glasshouse Press (2003)
| Abstract | This new book argues that at the core of legal philosophy’s principal debates there is essentially one issue judicial impartiality. Keeping this issue to the forefront,Raban’s approach sheds much light on many difficult and seemingly perplexing jurisprudential debates. Modern Legal Theory and Judicial Impartiality. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Law Philosophy Jurisprudence Judicial ethics Justice | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | $84.50 new Amazon page | |||||||||
| Call number | K230.R328.A37 2003 | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 1904385079 9781904385073 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLawrence B. Solum (2005). The Aretaic Turn in Constitutional Theory. Brooklyn Law Review 70:475.
Steven J. Burton (1992). Judging in Good Faith. Cambridge University Press.
Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov (2011). The Figuring of Morality in Adjudication: Not so Special? Ratio Juris 24 (3):284-303.
Barbara Baum Levenbook (1984). On Universal Relevance in Legal Reasoning. Law and Philosophy 3 (1):1 - 23.
Thom Brooks (2004). The Right to Trial by Jury. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):197–212.
Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (2010). Limits of Legality: The Ethics of Lawless Judging. Oxford University Press.
Lawrence B. Solum (2003). Virtue Jurisprudence a Virtue–Centred Theory of Judging. Metaphilosophy 34 (1/2):178--213.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads18 ( #67,448 of 548,974 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
