Graduate studies at Western
Theory and Decision 48 (4):311-318 (2000)
|Abstract||Seidenfeld (Seidenfeld, T. [1988a], Decision theory without 'Independence' or without 'Ordering', Economics and Philosophy 4: 267-290) gave an argument for Independence based on a supposition that admissibility of a sequential option is preserved under substitution of indifferents at choice nodes (S). To avoid a natural complaint that (S) begs the question against a critic of Independence, he provided an independent proof of (S) in his (Seidenfeld, T. [1988b], Rejoinder [to Hammond and McClennen], Economics and Philosophy 4: 309-315). In reply to my (Rabinowicz, W. , To have one's cake and eat it too: Sequential choice and expected-utility violations, The Journal of Philosophy 92: 586-620), in which I argue that the proof is invalid, Seidenfeld (Seidenfeld, T. , Substitution of indifferent options at choice nodes and admissibility: A reply to Rabinowicz, Theory and Decision 48: 305â310 this issue) submits that I fail to give due consideration to one of the underlying assumptions of his derivation: it is meant to apply only to those cases in which the agent's preferences are stable throughout the sequential decision process. The purpose of this note is to clarify the notion of preference stability so as meet this objection.|
|Keywords||Sequential choice Independence axiom backward induction preferences indifference preference stability tiebreaks Seidenfeld, teddy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wlodek Rabinowicz (1997). On Seidenfeldâs Criticism of Sophisticated Violations of the Independence Axiom. Theory and Decision 43 (3):279-292.
Teddy Seidenfeld (2000). Substitution of Indifferent Options at Choice Nodes and Admissibility: A Reply to Rabinowicz. Theory and Decision 48 (4):305-310.
Teddy Seidenfeld (2000). The Independence Postulate, Hypothetical and Called-Off Acts: A Further Reply to Rabinowicz. [REVIEW] Theory and Decision 48 (4):319-322.
Wlodek Rabinowicz (1995). To Have One's Cake and Eat It, Too: Sequential Choice and Expected-Utility Violations. Journal of Philosophy 92 (11):586-620.
Teddy Seidenfeld (1988). Decision Theory Without “Independence” or Without “Ordering”. Economics and Philosophy 4 (02):267-.
Teddy Seidenfeld, Mark J. Schervish & Joseph B. Kadane, Preference for Equivalent Random Variables: A Price for Unbounded Utilities.
Wlodek Rabinowicz (2001). A Centipede for Intransitive Preferrers. Studia Logica 67 (2):167-178.
Teddy Seidenfeld (1988). Rejoinder. Economics and Philosophy 4 (02):309-.
Christian W. Bach & Conrad Heilmann (2011). Agent Connectedness and Backward Induction. International Game Theory Review 13 (2):195-208.
Teddy Seidenfeld, Getting to Know Your Probabilities: Three Ways to Frame Personal Probabilities for Decision Making.
Teddy Seidenfeld, Joseph B. Kadane & Mark J. Schervish (1989). On the Shared Preferences of Two Bayesian Decision Makers. Journal of Philosophy 86 (5):225-244.
Deborah G. Mayo (1981). In Defense of the Neyman-Pearson Theory of Confidence Intervals. Philosophy of Science 48 (2):269-280.
Teddy Seidenfeld (1994). When Normal and Extensive Form Decisions Differ. In Dag Prawitz, Brian Skyrms & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Elsevier.
Hugues Leblanc (1981). What Price Substitutivity? A Note on Probability Theory. Philosophy of Science 48 (2):317-322.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads5 ( #170,048 of 722,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?