David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 69 (1-2):60-84 (2003)
This paper puts forward the following claims: (i) The size of inequality in welfare should be distinguished from its badness. (ii) The size of a pairwise inequality between two individuals can be measured by the absolute or the relative welfare distance between their welfare levels, but it does not depend on the welfare levels of other individuals. (iii) The size of inequality in a social state may be understood either as the degree of pairwise inequality or as its amount. (iv) The badness of a pairwise inequality may differ from its size in several ways; for example, the badness measure might go by the distance between priority-transformed welfare levels and/or it might assign heavier weight to larger distances. (v) The badness of a pairwise inequality may be either personal or impersonal, with the personal interpretation being internally consistent and, pace Temkin, independently tenable even if we reject the so-called Slogan (i.e., the Person-Affecting Claim). (vi) The aggregation procedure by which we arrive from the badness of pairwise inequalities to the badness of the inequality in a social state takes different forms depending on whether the badness of a pairwise inequality is interpreted in a personal or in an impersonal way. (vii) Since Temkin’s complaint-based measures of the badness of inequality follow the format appropriate for the personal interpretation, they seem out of place if one, like him, treats the badness of inequality as an impersonal value.
|Keywords||inequality equality egalitarianism Temkin, Larry measures of inequality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Larry S. Temkin (1986). Inequality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (2):99-121.
Larry S. Temkin (2003). Measuring Inequality's Badness: Does Size Matter? If So, How, If Not, What Does? Theoria 69 (1-2):85-108.
Caj Strandberg (2001). Two Conceptions of Inequality. Philosophical Papers 30 (2):169–199.
S. Subramanian (2002). An Elementary Interpretation of the Gini Inequality Index. Theory and Decision 52 (4):375-379.
Irina Mitina (2008). Inequality. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:459-467.
Ingmar Persson (2003). The Badness of Unjust Inequality. Theoria 69 (1-2):109-124.
Antonio Di Lorenzo (2013). Reassessment of Leggett Inequality. Foundations of Physics 43 (5):685-698.
Brian P. Simpson (2009). Wealth and Income Inequality: An Economic and Ethical Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):525 - 538.
Jeffrey D. Milyo & Jennifer M. Mellor (1999). Is Inequality Bad for Our Health? Critical Review 13 (3-4):359-372.
Wiemer Salverda, Brian Nolan & Timothy M. Smeeding (eds.) (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality. OUP Oxford.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads32 ( #118,814 of 1,789,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #75,392 of 1,789,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?