Enriching our views on clinical ethics: Results of a qualitative study of the moral psychology of healthcare ethics committee members [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (1):57-67 (2008)
The contribution of healthcare ethics committee (HEC) members to HECs is fundamental. However, little is known about how HEC members view clinical ethics. We report results from a qualitative study of the moral psychology of HEC members. We found that contrary to the existing Kohlberg-based studies, HEC members hold a pragmatic non-expert view of clinical ethics based mainly on respect for persons and a commitment to the patient’s good. In general, HEC members hold deflationary views regarding moral theory. Ethical principles are not abstract foundations but the expression of moral commitments to patients that pre-exist awareness of moral theory. Emotions and proximity to patient sufferance fundamentally shape the views of HEC members on clinical ethics. Further work at the intersection of clinical ethics and qualitative research could bring to the foreground lay perspectives on moral problems that may differ from bioethics expert views.
|Keywords||Healthcare ethics committee Moral psychology Pragmatism Clinical ethics Healthcare ethics committee members|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Danielle E. Dye, Leanne Youngs, Beverley McNamara, Jack Goldblatt & Peter O'Leary (2010). The Disclosure of Genetic Information: A Human Research Ethics Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):103-109.
Similar books and articles
Anita J. Tarzian & Catherine A. Marco (2008). Responding to Abusive Patients: A Primer for Ethics Committee Members. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 20 (2):127-136.
Reidar Pedersen, Victoria Akre & Reidun Førde (2009). Barriers and Challenges in Clinical Ethics Consultations: The Experiences of Nine Clinical Ethics Committees. Bioethics 23 (8):460-469.
Charles C. Engel (1992). Exploring the Role of the Ethics Committee Psychiatrist. HEC Forum 4 (6):360-371.
Eleanor Updale (2009). The Role of Clinical Ethics Committees. Diametros 22:116-123.
Kenneth V. Iserson (1991). Point and Counterpoint: Should the Ethics Committee Visit the Patient? No: Hec Members Should Not Visit the Patient. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 3 (1):19-22.
Marek Czarkowski (2006). The Protection of Patients' Rights in Clinical Trials. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):131-138.
Allen E. Buchanan (1996). The Controversy Over Retrospective Moral Judgment. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):245-250.
L. Dauwerse, T. A. Abma, B. Molewijk & G. Widdershoven (2013). Goals of Clinical Ethics Support: Perceptions of Dutch Healthcare Institutions. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 21 (4):323-337.
Charlotte McDaniel (2010). Assessing Physicians' Roles on Health Care Ethics Committees. HEC Forum 22 (4):275-286.
Adrian Bardon (2004). Ethics Education and Value Prioritization Among Members of U.S. Hospital Ethics Committees. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):395-406.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #160,876 of 1,096,504 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #62,479 of 1,096,504 )
How can I increase my downloads?