In Lawrence C. Becker Mary Becker & Charlotte Becker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ethics, Volume 2. Routledge (2001)
|Abstract||According to Transitivity, if A is better than B, and B is better than C, then A is better than C. We may understand “better than” as short for any of the following: “intrinsically better than,” “all things considered better than,” “hedonically better than,” and “better for a person than.” The same puzzle arises on each interpretation. Transitivity seems entrenched in our conceptual scheme, if not analytically true; its failure implies, implausibly, that some possibilities cannot be ranked in terms of value; scads of three-member sets inductively confirm it; and hypothetical money-pumpers coax its detractors out of house and home by proffering a series of trades—C for A, B for C and A for B (and then repeating the cycle)—for an endlessly accumulating price. Nevertheless, two highly plausible principles entail that Transitivity is false.|
|Keywords||Transitivity Intransitivity betterness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Chris Starmer (1999). Cycling with Rules of Thumb: An Experimental Test for a New Form of Non-Transitive Behaviour. Theory and Decision 46 (2):139-157.
Alex Friedman & Marion Danis (2011). Intransitivity and Priority Setting. Journal of Philosophical Research 36:173-189.
B. de Schuymer, H. de Meyer, B. de Baets & S. Jenei (2003). On the Cycle-Transitivity of the Dice Model. Theory and Decision 54 (3):261-285.
Jonathan Aldred (2007). Intransitivity and Vague Preferences. Journal of Ethics 11 (4):377 - 403.
Mary Hesse (1970). Theories and the Transitivity of Confirmation. Philosophy of Science 37 (1):50-63.
Stuart Rachels (1998). Counterexamples to the Transitivity of Better Than. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (1):71 – 83.
Alastair Norcross (1999). Intransitivity and the Person-Affecting Principle. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):769-776.
William A. Edmundson (2009). Pluralism, Intransitivity, Incoherence. In Mark White (ed.), THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF LAW AND ECONOMICS. Cambridge University Press.
Stuart Rachels (2004). Repugnance or Intransitivity: A Repugnant But Forced Choice. In Jesper Ryberg Torbjorn Tannsjo (ed.), The Repugnant Conclusion: Essays on Population Ethics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #33,678 of 722,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,437 of 722,746 )
How can I increase my downloads?