Review essay of contingent future persons, Jan C. Heller and Nick Fotion, eds [Book Review]
Bioethics 13:160-167 (1999)
|Abstract||This essay critically comments on Contingent Future Persons (1997), an anthology of thirteen papers on the same topic as Obligations to Future Generations (1978), namely, the morality of decisions affecting the existence, number and identity of future persons. In my discussion, I identify the basic point of dispute between R. M. Hare and Michael Lockwood on potentiality; I criticize Nick Fotion's thesis that the Repugnant Conclusion is too far-fetched to be philosophically valuable; I object to Clark Wolf's "Impure Consequentialist Theory of Obligation"; and I discuss the Non-Identity Problem in connection with essays by Robert Elliot and Ingmar Persson.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roy W. Perrett (2003). Future Generations and the Metaphysics of the Self: Western and Indian Philosophical Perspectives. Asian Philosophy 13 (1):29 – 37.
Amy Kind (2004). The Metaphysics of Personal Identity and Our Special Concern for the Future. Metaphilosophy 35 (4):536-553.
Ernest Partridge (1998). Should We Seek a Better Future? Ethics and the Environment 3 (1):81 - 95.
Stuart Rachels (2007). Review of Mulgan, Tim, Future People: A Moderate Consequentialist Account of Our Obligations to Future Generations. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):506-509.
Kai M. A. Chan (2004). The Golden Rule and the Potentiality Principle: Future Persons and Contingent Interests. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):33–42.
Nick Fotion (1990). Book Review:Essays on Political Morality. R. M. Hare; Essays in Ethical Theory. R. M. Hare. [REVIEW] Ethics 100 (4):889-.
Steve Vanderheiden (2006). Conservation, Foresight, and the Future Generations Problem. Inquiry 49 (4):337 – 352.
David Heyd (1998). Human Genome Research and the Challenge of Contingent Future Persons: Toward an Impersonal Theocentric Approach Jan Christian Heller. Bioethics 12 (2):173–176.
Stuart Rachels (1999). Review Essay: Contingent Future Persons, Edited by Nick Fotion and Jan C. Heller. Bioethics 13 (2):160–167.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?