David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Theory and Practice 29 (2):325-41 (2003)
Do people deserve a chance to right the wrongs they have committed? Would denying an offender the opportunity to make amends amount to an injustice? There are compelling reasons to grant such a right. However, there are also significant objections. First, a right to make amends potentially undermines the state's right to punish criminal wrongdoers. Secondly, the alleged right threatens to put undue pressure on victims to forgive their abusers. In this essay I argue that these objections can be met and that wrongdoers do indeed have a right to make amends.
|Keywords||criminal justice law reparation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Linda Radzik (2009). Making Amends: Atonement in Morality, Law, and Politics. Oxford University Press.
Linda Radzik (2007). Offenders, the Making of Amends and the State. In Gerry Johnstone & Daniel W. van Ness (eds.), Handbook of Restorative Justice. 192--207.
Linda Radzik (2004). Making Amends. American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (2):141-54.
Claire Katz & Linda Radzik (2010). The Ethical and Political Dimensions of Making Amends: A Dialogue. South Central Review 27 (3):144-161.
Christopher Bennett (2008). The Apology Ritual: A Philosophical Theory of Punishment. Cambridge University Press.
John Wettersten (1991). The Fleck Affair: Fashionsv.Heritage. Inquiry 34 (4):475-498.
A. M. Martin (2012). Making Amends: Atonement in Morality, Law, and Politics, by Linda Radzik. Mind 121 (482):515-519.
Paul M. Hughes (2011). Linda Radzik, Making Amends: Atonement in Morality, Law, and Politics. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (3):343-350.
Cheshire Calhoun (2009). Review of Linda Radzik, Making Amends: Atonement in Morality, Law, and Politics. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (8).
Mitchell N. Berman (2013). Rehabilitating Retributivism. Law and Philosophy 32 (1):83-108.
Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (2015). ‘To Serve and Protect’: The Ends of Harm by Victor Tadros. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):49-71.
Alice MacLachlan (2011). Relating After Wrongdoing: A Review of Forgiveness From a Feminist Perspective. By Kathryn Norlock and Making Amends: Atonement in Morality, Law and Politics. By Linda Radzik. [REVIEW] Hypatia 26 (4):851-857.
John Tasioulas (2003). Mercy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (2):101–132.
Brandon Hamber (1999). Symbolic Closure Through Memory, Reparation and Revenge in Post-Conflict Societies. Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation.
R. A. Duff (2010). Towards a Theory of Criminal Law? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28.
Added to index2010-10-25
Total downloads24 ( #165,043 of 1,911,386 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #251,182 of 1,911,386 )
How can I increase my downloads?