Living with Uncertainty: The Moral Significance of Ignorance * By MICHAEL J. ZIMMERMAN [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Analysis 69 (4):785-787 (2009)
Michael J. Zimmerman offers a conceptual analysis of the moral ‘ought’ that focuses on moral decision-making under uncertainty. His central case, originally presented by Frank Jackson, concerns a doctor who must choose among three treatments for a minor ailment. Her evidence suggests that drug B will partially cure her patient, that one of either drug A or C would cure him completely, but that the other drug would kill him. Accepting the intuition that the doctor ought to choose drug B, Zimmerman argues that moral obligation consists in performing the action that is ‘prospectively best,’ that is ‘that which, from the moral point of view, it is most reasonable for the agent to choose’ given the evidence available to her at the time .Zimmerman defends his Prospective View of moral obligation against two main competitors in the long, first chapter of the book. According to the Objective View, a person ought to choose what is, in fact, the best option. The doctor ought to give her patient whichever drug will actually cure him. The fact that the doctor cannot know whether this is drug …
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dan Moller (2009). Book Reviews:Living with Uncertainty: The Moral Significance of Ignorance. [REVIEW] Ethics 119 (3):606-611.
Kevin Timpe (2009). Review of Michael Zimmerman, Living with Uncertainty: The Moral Significance of Ignorance. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (9).
Clayton Littlejohn (2009). Critical Notice of Michael Zimmerman's, Living with Uncertainty. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 50 (4):235–247.
Michael J. Zimmerman (1997). Moral Responsibility and Ignorance. Ethics 107 (3):410-426.
Michael E. Zimmerman (1980). Socratic Ignorance and Authenticity. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 29:133-149.
Michael J. Zimmerman (2002). Controlling Ignorance: A Bitter Truth. Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (3):483–490.
Stuart Firestein (2012). Ignorance: How It Drives Science. Oxford University Press.
Michael Gorr (1991). An Essay on Moral Responsibility, by Michael Zimmerman. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (3):713-716.
Neil Levy (2015). Zimmerman’s The Immorality of Punishment: A Critical Essay. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):103-112.
Adale Sholock (2012). Methodology of the Privileged: White Anti-Racist Feminism, Systematic Ignorance, and Epistemic Uncertainty. Hypatia 27 (3):701 - 714.
Alexander A. Guerrero (2007). Don't Know, Don't Kill: Moral Ignorance, Culpability, and Caution. Philosophical Studies 136 (1):59-97.
Thom Baguley & S. Ian Robertson (2000). Where Does Fast and Frugal Cognition Stop? The Boundary Between Complex Cognition and Simple Heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):742-743.
Gideon Rosen (2002). Culpability and Ignorance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (1):61–84.
Added to index2010-12-11
Total downloads50 ( #95,711 of 1,932,462 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #225,373 of 1,932,462 )
How can I increase my downloads?