David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 21 (2):139 - 152 (2011)
The Mencius contains several negative remarks about the Mohists and their doctrine of ?universal love? (jian?ai). However, little attention has been paid to whether Mencius? descriptions of Mohism were accurate. Fortunately, there is a surviving record of the beliefs of Mozi in the text that bears his name. In this essay, I analyze this text and descriptions of Mohism from other early Chinese texts, and compare them to the criticisms of Mohism in the Mencius. Ultimately, I show that the image of the Mohists as ones who promoted a doctrine that contradicted filial piety was inaccurate, and obscured the complexities of filial piety in the Warring States period
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Dennis M. Ahern (1976). Is Mo Tzu a Utilitarian? Journal of Chinese Philosophy 3 (2):185-193.
Kristopher Duda (2001). Reconsidering Mo Tzu on the Foundations of Morality. Asian Philosophy 11 (1):23 – 31.
John Emerson (1996). Yang Chu's Discovery of the Body. Philosophy East and West 46 (4):533-566.
A. C. Graham (1978). Later Mohist Logic, Ethics, and Science. School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Chad Hansen (1992). A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Wai Wai Chiu (2013). Jian Ai and the Mohist Attack of Early Confucianism. Philosophy Compass 8 (5):425-437.
Similar books and articles
Whalen Lai (1993). The Public Good That Does the Public Good: A New Reading of Mohism. Asian Philosophy 3 (2):125 – 141.
Kwong-loi Shun (1991). Mencius' Criticism of Mohism: An Analysis of "Meng Tzu" 3a:. Philosophy East and West 41 (2):203-214.
Qingping Liu (2001). Is Mencius' Doctrine of 'Commiseration' Tenable? Asian Philosophy 11 (2):73 – 84.
Qingping Liu (2004). Is Mencius' Doctrine of 'Extending Affection' Tenable? Asian Philosophy 14 (1):79 – 90.
Kwong-loi Shun (1997). Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford University Press.
Mencius (2009). Mencius. Columbia University Press.
Chun-Chieh Huang (2013). What's Ignored in Itō Jinsai's Interpretation of Mencius? Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12 (1):1-10.
James Behuniak (2002). Mencius on Becoming Human. Dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa
Qingping Liu (2003). Filiality Versus Sociality and Individuality: On Confucianism as "Consanguinitism". Philosophy East and West 53 (2):234-250.
John Schrecker (1997). Filial Piety as a Basis for Human Rights in Confucius and Mencius. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 24 (3):401-412.
James A. Ryan (1997). A Defence of Mencius' Ethical Naturalism. Asian Philosophy 7 (1):23 – 36.
James A. Ryan (1998). Moral Philosophy and Moral Psychology in Mencius. Asian Philosophy 8 (1):47 – 64.
Liu Qingping (2007). Special Topic: Filial Piety: The Root of Morality or the Source of Corruption? Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (1):1-19.
Jane Geaney (1999). Associate Professor of Religion. Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
Added to index2011-05-11
Total downloads14 ( #116,104 of 1,103,046 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,820 of 1,103,046 )
How can I increase my downloads?