In Lubomira Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Disorder. Oxford University Press (2012)
|Abstract||In this Introduction, I situate the underlying project “Autonomy and Mental Disorder” with reference to current debates on autonomy in moral and political philosophy, and the philosophy of action. I then offer an overview of the individual contributions. More specifically, I begin by identifying three points of convergence in the debates at issue, stating that autonomy is: 1) a fundamentally liberal concept; 2) an agency concept and; 3) incompatible with (severe) mental disorder. Next, I explore, in the context of decisional capacity assessments, the difficulties to reconcile 1) and 2) with 3) which they at the same time seem to imply. Having clarified the centrality of a cogent notion of mental disorder for addressing these difficulties, I comment on three promising lines of inquiry about the nature and scope of autonomy that emerge from the following chapters.|
|Keywords||autonomy and agency mental disorder decisional capacity reason and value liberalism|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lubomira Radoilska (ed.) (2012). Autonomy and Mental Disorder. Oxford University Press.
Lubomira Radoilska (2012). Autonomy and Ulysses Arrangements. In Lubomira Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Disorder. Oxford University Press.
Gareth S. Owen, Fabian Freyenhagen, Genevra Richardson & Matthew Hotopf (2009). Mental Capacity and Decisional Autonomy: An Interdisciplinary Challenge. Inquiry 52 (1):79 – 107.
Hallvard Lillehammer (2012). Autonomy, Value and the First Person. In Lubomira Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Disorder. Oxford University Press.
K. W. M. Fulford & Lubomira Radoilska (2012). Three Challenges From Delusion for Theories of Autonomy. In Lubomira Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Disorder. Oxford University Press.
Tiffany Chenneville, Kimberly Sibille & Debra Bendell-Estroff (2010). Decisional Capacity Among Minors with Hiv: A Model for Balancing Autonomy Rights with the Need for Protection. Ethics and Behavior 20 (2):83 – 94.
Debra Bendell-Estroff, Kimberly Sibille & Tiffany Chenneville (2010). Decisional Capacity Among Minors With HIV: A Model for Balancing Autonomy Rights With the Need for Protection. Ethics and Behavior 20 (2):83-94.
Jules Holroyd (forthcoming). Clarifying Capacity: Reasons and Value. In Lubomira Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Health. Oxford University Press.
George Graham (2010). The Disordered Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Mental Illness. Routledge.
Alfredo Gaete (2009). The Concept of Mental Disorder: A Proposal. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 15 (4):327-339.
Aanand D. Naik, Carmel B. Dyer, Mark E. Kunik & Laurence B. McCullough (2009). Patient Autonomy for the Management of Chronic Conditions: A Two-Component Re-Conceptualization. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):23 – 30.
Bengt Brülde (2007). Mental Disorder and Values. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (2):pp. 93-102.
Dusan Kecmanovic (2011). Why the Mental Disorder Concept Matters. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 4 (1):1-9.
Daniel D. Moseley & Gary J. Gala (forthcoming). The Consumer Protection Model of Decisional Capacity Evaluation. Southwest Philosophy Review.
Alfred Mele (2012). Autonomy and Neuroscience. In L. Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Disorder. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2012-06-05
Total downloads23 ( #54,691 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #13,107 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?