David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (4):633-655 (1997)
At issue in this paper is the question of the appropriate relationship between the philosophy and history of science. The discussion starts with a brief sketch of Kuhn's approach, followed by an analysis of the so-called 'testing-theories-of-scientific-change programme'. This programme is an attempt at a more rigorous approach to the historical philosophy of science. Since my conclusion is that, by and large, this attempt has failed, I proceed to examine some more promising approaches. First, I deal with Hacking's recent views on the issues in question, particularly his notion of a 'style of reasoning'. Next, Nickle's reconstructionist interpretation of the development of science and his views on Whig history are addressed. Finally, I propose an account of philosophy as a theoretical, an interpretative and explanatory, enterprise. Thus, three alternatives to the Kuhnian paradigm are discussed, alternatives that share a recognition of the relative autonomy of philosophy from history. Hence, they assume a less tight relationship between philosophy and history of science than is the case within the Kuhnian paradigm.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
Michel Callon & Bruno Latour (1992). Don't Throw the Baby Out with the Bath School! A Reply to Collins and Yearley. In Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture. University of Chicago Press. 343--368.
H. M. Collins (1975). The Seven Sexes: A Study in the Sociology of a Phenomenon, or the Replication of Experiments in Physics. Sociology 9 (2):205.
Gary Gutting (1980). Science as Discovery. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 131:26-48.
Ian Hacking (1992). 'Style' for Historians and Philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (1):1-20.
Ian Hacking (1988). Philosophers of Experiment. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:147 - 156.
Citations of this work BETA
Hans Radder (2012). What Prospects for a General Philosophy of Science? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 43 (1):89-92.
Similar books and articles
Kenneth L. Caneva (1998). Objectivity, Relativism, and the Individual: A Role for a Post-Kuhnian History of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (3):327-344.
L. K. (1998). Objectivity, Relativism, and the Individual: A Role for a Post-Kuhnian History of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (3):327-344.
Leo Corry (1993). Kuhnian Issues, Scientific Revolutions and the History of Mathematics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (1):95-117.
Mark A. Stone (1991). A Kuhnian Model of Falsifiability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):177-185.
William H. Austin (1972). Paradigms, Rationality, and Partial Communication. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 3 (2):203-218.
K. Shrader-Frechette (1977). Atomism in Crisis: An Analysis of the Current High Energy Paradigm. Philosophy of Science 44 (3):409-440.
Bojana Mladenović (2007). "Muckraking in History": The Role of the History of Science in Kuhn's Philosophy. Perspectives on Science 15 (3):261-294.
R. E. Hendrick & Anthony Murphy (1981). Atomism and the Illusion of Crisis: The Danger of Applying Kuhnian Categories to Current Particle Physics. Philosophy of Science 48 (3):454-468.
Thomas Nickles (ed.) (2003). Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge University Press.
B. Pourciau (2000). Intuitionism as a (Failed) Kuhnian Revolution in Mathematics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):297-329.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #61,004 of 1,088,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?