David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Ideas 54 (2):221-240 (1993)
Of all the Enlightenment questions reopened in Britain by the French Revolution, none was more hotly debated and none became more politically charged than universal benevolence-the ideathat benevolence and sympathy can be extended to all humanity. Inthe British controversy overthe Revolution, issues that had been argued by eighteenth-century moral philosophers surfaced not only with a new urgency but also with a fresh sense of possible political and social implications; taking a stance on universal benevolence quickly came to imply an attitude towards the Revolution and apolitical position.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Evan Radcliffe (1993). Revolutionary Writing, Moral Philosophy, and Universal Benevolence in the Eighteenth. Journal of the History of Ideas 54 (2):221-240.
Tom Aerwyn Roberts (1973). The Concept of Benevolence: Aspects of Eighteenth-Century Moral Philosophy. London,Macmillan.
John P. Reeder Jr (1998). Extensive Benevolence. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):47 - 70.
D. C. Stove (2011). What's Wrong with Benevolence: Happiness, Private Property, and the Limits of Enlightenment. Encounter Books.
Alejandra Mancilla, The Bridge of Benevolence: Hutcheson and Mencius. [REVIEW] Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy.
John P. Reeder Jr (1998). Benevolence, Special Relations, and Voluntary Poverty: An Introduction. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):3 - 15.
Malcolm Jack (1978). Social Science and the Ignoble Savage, And: The Concept of Benevolence: Aspects of Eighteenth-Century Moral Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (1):110-112.
James King (1976). The Concept of Benevolence. Aspects of Eighteenth-Century Moral Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1):109-112.
Guorong Yang (2006). On Luo Congyan's Ethics. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):102-113.
Francis Hutcheson, An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense.
Noriaki Iwasa (2011). Sentimentalism and the Is-Ought Problem. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (33):323-352.
Brad Hooker (2010). When is Impartiality Morally Appropriate? In Brian Feltham & John Cottingham (eds.), Partiality and Impartiality: Morality, Special Relationships, and the Wider World. Oup Oxford.
Qiyong Guo (2007). Mou Zongsan's View of Interpreting Confucianism by “Moral Autonomy”. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):345-362.
Rico Vitz (2002). Hume and the Limits of Benevolence. Hume Studies 28 (2):271-296.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-02-13
Total downloads1 ( #434,265 of 1,098,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #286,682 of 1,098,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?