David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Ideas 54 (2):221-240 (1993)
Of all the Enlightenment questions reopened in Britain by the French Revolution, none was more hotly debated and none became more politically charged than universal benevolence-the ideathat benevolence and sympathy can be extended to all humanity. Inthe British controversy overthe Revolution, issues that had been argued by eighteenth-century moral philosophers surfaced not only with a new urgency but also with a fresh sense of possible political and social implications; taking a stance on universal benevolence quickly came to imply an attitude towards the Revolution and apolitical position.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John Brewer (2014). Between Distance and Sympathy: Dr John Moore's Philosophical Travel Writing. Modern Intellectual History 11 (3):655-675.
Similar books and articles
Evan Radcliffe (1993). Revolutionary Writing, Moral Philosophy, and Universal Benevolence in the Eighteenth. Journal of the History of Ideas 54 (2):221-240.
Tom Aerwyn Roberts (1973). The Concept of Benevolence: Aspects of Eighteenth-Century Moral Philosophy. London,Macmillan.
John P. Reeder Jr (1998). Extensive Benevolence. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):47 - 70.
D. C. Stove (2011). What's Wrong with Benevolence: Happiness, Private Property, and the Limits of Enlightenment. Encounter Books.
Alejandra Mancilla, The Bridge of Benevolence: Hutcheson and Mencius. [REVIEW] Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy.
John P. Reeder Jr (1998). Benevolence, Special Relations, and Voluntary Poverty: An Introduction. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):3 - 15.
Malcolm Jack (1978). Social Science and the Ignoble Savage, And: The Concept of Benevolence: Aspects of Eighteenth-Century Moral Philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (1):110-112.
James King (1976). The Concept of Benevolence. Aspects of Eighteenth-Century Moral Philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1):109-112.
Guorong Yang (2006). On Luo Congyan's Ethics. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):102-113.
Francis Hutcheson (1769). An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections with Illustrations on the Moral Sense. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Noriaki Iwasa (2011). Sentimentalism and the Is-Ought Problem. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (33):323-352.
Brad Hooker (2010). When is Impartiality Morally Appropriate? In Brian Feltham & John Cottingham (eds.), Partiality and Impartiality: Morality, Special Relationships, and the Wider World. OUP Oxford
Qiyong Guo (2007). Mou Zongsan's View of Interpreting Confucianism by “Moral Autonomy”. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):345-362.
Rico Vitz (2002). Hume and the Limits of Benevolence. Hume Studies 28 (2):271-296.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-02-13
Total downloads1 ( #771,332 of 1,792,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,764 of 1,792,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?