David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Horizons 11 (1):75-97 (2010)
In Fear and Trembling Kierkegaard outlines and defends a faith-based religious ethic, belief in which justifies transgressing the universal ethical norms of the community. In contrast to certain commentators who maintain that Kierkegaard’s argument is about the individual’s relation to God, I understand that this aspect of Kierkegaard’s argument is only important because he maintains that faith in God is a necessary aspect of authentic being. Thus, I argue that Kierkegaard’s argument is about the role faith plays in the formation and transformation of individual identity. To defend my argument, I pay particular attention to: 1) why he maintains that authenticity is found in the faith-based religious ethic; 2) what transformative impact the individual's adoption of the faith-based religious ethic can have on his/her existence; and 3) what the structural relation is between the authentic faith-based religious ethic and the universal ethic of the community. I conclude by showing that Kierkegaard’s failure to differentiate between the contents of different faith-based actions leads his faith-based religious ethic to fall into an ethical antinomy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jack Mulder Jr (2002). Re-Radicalizing Kierkegaard: An Alternative to Religiousness C in Light of an Investigation Into the Teleological Suspension of the Ethical. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 35 (3):303-324.
Roe Fremstedal (2013). The Moral Argument for the Existence of God and Immortality. Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):50-78.
Andrew Cross (2003). Faith and the Suspension of the Ethical in Fear and Trembling. Inquiry 46 (1):3 – 28.
Jack Mulder (2002). Re-Radicalizing Kierkegaard: An Alternative to Religiousness C in Light of an Investigation Into the Teleological Suspension of the Ethical. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 35 (3):303-324.
Paul Dietrichson (1969). Ii. Introduction to a Reappraisal of Fear and Trembling. Inquiry 12 (1-4):236 – 245.
James Bogen (1962). Kierkegaard and the 'Teleological Suspension of the Ethical'. Inquiry 5 (1-4):305-317.
Edmund N. Santurri (1977). Kierkegaard's "Fear and Trembling" in Logical Perspective. Journal of Religious Ethics 5 (2):225 - 247.
Daniel Berthold (2013). Kierkegaard and Camus: Either/Or? [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (2):137-150.
C. Stephen Evans (2000). Kierkegaard on Religious Authority. Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):48-67.
Merold Westphal (2011). Kierkegaard on Faith, Reason, and Passion. Faith and Philosophy 28 (1):82-92.
John Lippitt (2003). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kierkegaard and Fear and Trembling. Routledge.
R. Zachary Manis (2011). Kierkegaard and Evans on the Problem of Abraham. Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (3):474-492.
George B. Connell (2009). Kierkegaard and Confucius: The Religious Dimensions of Ethical Selfhood. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (2):133-149.
Patrick Goold (1990). Reading Kierkegaard. Faith and Philosophy 7 (3):304-315.
Added to index2010-09-22
Total downloads54 ( #29,421 of 1,101,585 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #59,635 of 1,101,585 )
How can I increase my downloads?