Graduate studies at Western
Clarendon Press (1997)
|Abstract||This book is a study of Søren Kierkegaard's elucidation of the condition by which the Truth may be learned. Like Kierkegaard's pseudonym, Johannes Climacus, we are concerned in particular with that Truth which concerns us ultimately and which is confessed by Christians to be disclosed in Jesus Christ. Called faith by Climacus in Philosophical Fragments, this condition is characterized by a transformation of the individual under the impact of revelation and is received as a gift from God rather than attained through human resourcefulness. The epistemological ramifications of this transformation are explored both in terms of the New Testament concept of metanoia and in comparison with claims to cognitive progress in other fields. We conclude that the account of Christian conversion given by Climacus in Philosophical Fragments and approved by Kierkegaard in his acknowledged works is a faithful elucidation of the concept of metanoia and remains a pertinent challenge to the persistent attempts of moderns and post-moderns alike who propose to learn the Truth on quite different terms. Murray Rae thus seeks to develop a new interpretation of Kierkegaard and to challenge some widely followed theological epistemologies.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$97.99 used (51% off) $145.27 new (27% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul Muench (2003). The Socratic Method of Kierkegaard’s Pseudonym Johannes Climacus: Indirect Communication and the Art of ‘Taking Away’. In Poul Houe & Gordon D. Marino (eds.), Søren Kierkegaard and the Word(s). Reitzel.
Sylvia Walsh (1999). Murray A. Rae, Kierkegaard's Vision of the Incarnation: By Faith Transformed. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 46 (3):191-193.
Christoper Hamilton (1999). Murray A. Rae Kierkegaard's Vision of the Incarnation: By Faith Transformed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997). Pp. XII+267. £37.50 Hbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 35 (1):99-111.
Jacob Howland (2006). Kierkegaard and Socrates: A Study in Philosophy and Faith. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Muench (2010). Kierkegaard's Socratic Pseudonym: A Profile of Johannes Climacus. In Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.), Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen N. Dunning (1995). Love Is Not Enough. Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):22-39.
Jonathan Malesic (2007). Illusion and Offense in Philosophical Fragments : Kierkegaard's Inversion of Feuerbach's Critique of Christianity. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (1):43 - 55.
Paul Muench (2006). Kierkegaard's Socratic Task. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Rick Anthony Furtak (ed.) (2010). Kierkegaard's 'Concluding Unscientific Postscript': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Alexander Pruss, Faith, Paradox, Reason and the Argumentum Spiritus Sancti in Climacus and Kierkegaard.
Gavin Rae (2010). Kierkegaard, the Self, Authenticity and the Teleological Suspension of the Ethical. Critical Horizons 11 (1):75-97.
Daniel Berthold (2013). Kierkegaard and Camus: Either/Or? [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (2):137-150.
C. Stephen Evans (1990). The Relevance of Historical Evidence for Christian Faith. Faith and Philosophy 7 (4):470-485.
Daniel Berthold-Bond (1998). Lunar Musings? An Investigation of Hegel's and Kierkegaard's Portraits of Despair. Religious Studies 34 (1):33-59.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads1 ( #293,975 of 754,609 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 754,609 )
How can I increase my downloads?