David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 31 (4):397–418 (2001)
This article is a discourse analysis of two historical inquiries into what clinici-ans today call attention deficit hyperactivity disorder . Of primary con-cern in this regard are psychodynamic perspectives towards ADHD symptoms, championed by psychoanalysts and psychologists, and neurological perspectives towards ADHD, which continue to favor a purely physiological approach to understanding the disorder. Those within the psychodynamic camp are inclined to view ADHD as an interactional difficulty between self and social environment - a condition best remedied by psychotherapy. Those within the neurological camp see ADHD as a specific brain process, whose effective treatment depends upon adequate psychopharmacology. This essay argues that both psychodynamic and neurological perspectives towards ADHD have strategized to legitimate one perspective through the expulsion of the other. Within the current era of ADHD nomenclature and treatment it is clear that neurological perspectives dominate the debate. However, neurological perspectives continue to be haunted by a considerable amount of skepticism, both nationally and internationally. Because of this it would be difficult to assert that neurological perspectives, though winning the “legitimation race” in contemporary understandings of ADHD, are entirely monolithic sources of ADHD knowledge
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rosemary Tannock (2005). Hypodopaminergic Function Influences Learning and Memory as Well as Delay Gradients. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):444-445.
Susan C. C. Hawthorne (2010). Institutionalized Intolerance of ADHD: Sources and Consequences. Hypatia 25 (3):504 - 526.
Robert D. Oades & Hanna Christiansen (2005). ADHD Theories Still Need to Take More on Board: Serotonin and Pre-Executive Variability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):438-438.
Aribert Rothenberger & Roumen Kirov (2005). Changes in Sleep-Wake Behavior May Be More Than Just an Epiphenomenon of ADHD. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):439-439.
Michiel van Lambalgen, Claudia van Kruistum & Esther Parigger (2008). Discourse Processing in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (Adhd). Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (4):467-487.
Seija Sandberg (2005). The Biopsychosocial Context of ADHD. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):441-442.
Paul Neufeld & Michael Foy (2006). Historical Reflections on the Ascendancy of ADHD in North America, C. 1980 - C. 2005. British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (4):449 - 470.
Espen Borgå Johansen, Terje Sagvolden, Heidi Aase & Vivienne Ann Russell (2005). The Dynamic Developmental Theory of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Present Status and Future Perspectives. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):451-454.
Florence Levy (2005). ADHD, Comorbidity, Synaptic Gates and Re-Entrant Circuits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):434-435.
Paul Cooper (2008). Like Alligators Bobbing for Poodles? A Critical Discussion of Education, Adhd and the Biopsychosocial Perspective. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):457-474.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #238,295 of 1,939,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,435 of 1,939,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?