David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 83 (2):201 - 214 (1990)
Duhem has generally been understood to have maintained that the major Greek astronomers were instrumentalists. This view has emerged mainly from a reading of his 1908 publication To Save the Phenomena. In it he sharply contrasted a sophisticated Greek interpretation of astronomical models (for Duhem this was that they were mathematical contrivances) with a naive insistence of the Arabs on their concrete reality. But in Le Système du monde, which began to appear in 1913, Duhem modified his views on Greek astronomy considerably; his more subtle understanding included the recognition that many Greeks subordinated mathematical astronomy to physical theory. But he could not completely repudiate his earlier views about Greek astronomy in part because his extreme nineteenth century prejudices led him to continue to insist on a clear-cut demarcation between Greek and Arabic astronomy. The inevitable result is a certain unevenness in the Système and some glaring inconsistencies.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem (1969). To Save the Phenomena, an Essay on the Idea of Physical Theory From Plato to Galileo. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
G. E. R. Lloyd (1978). Saving the Appearances. Classical Quarterly 28 (01):202-.
R. Niall D. Martin (1987). Saving Duhem and Galileo: Duhemian Methodology and the Saving of the Phenomena. History of Science 25:301-319.
Edward Said (1979). Orientalism. Vintage.
Citations of this work BETA
Damien Janos (2011). Moving the Orbs: Astronomy, Physics, and Metaphysics, and the Problem of Celestial Motion According to Ibn Sīnā. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 21 (02):165-214.
Similar books and articles
Paul Needham (1996). Macroscopic Objects: An Exercise in Duhemian Ontology. Philosophy of Science 63 (2):205-224.
P. Needham (2002). Duhem's Theory of Mixture in the Light of the Stoic Challenge to the Aristotelian Conception. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (4):685-708.
Michael H. Shank (2002). Regiomontanus on Ptolemy, Physical Orbs, and Astronomical Fictionalism: Goldsteinian Themes in the "Defense of Theon Against George of Trebizond". Perspectives on Science 10 (2):179-207.
Roberto Maiocchi (1990). Pierre Duhem's the Aim and Structure of Physical Theory: A Book Against Conventionalism. Synthese 83 (3):385 - 400.
Roger Ariew & Peter Barker (1986). Duhem on Maxwell: A Case-Study in the Interrelations of History of Science and Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:145 - 156.
Anastasios A. Brenner (1990). Holism a Century Ago: The Elaboration of Duhem's Thesis. Synthese 83 (3):325 - 335.
Peter Barker & Bernard R. Goldstein (1998). Realism and Instrumentalism in Sixteenth Century Astronomy: A Reappraisal. Perspectives on Science 6 (3):232-258.
Michael J. Crowe (1990). Duhem and History and Philosophy of Mathematics. Synthese 83 (3):431 - 447.
Ernan McMullin (1990). Comment: Duhem's Middle Way. Synthese 83 (3):421 - 430.
P. Needham (1998). Duhem's Physicalism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (1):33-62.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #134,852 of 1,696,589 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #95,693 of 1,696,589 )
How can I increase my downloads?