Against throne and altar: Machiavelli and political theory under the English Republic

New York: Cambridge University Press (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modern republicanism - distinguished from its classical counterpart by its commercial character and jealous distrust of those in power, by its use of representative institutions, and by its employment of a separation of powers and a system of checks and balances - owes an immense debt to the republican experiment conducted in England between 1649, when Charles I was executed, and 1660, when Charles II was crowned. Though abortive, this experiment left a legacy in the political science articulated both by its champions, John Milton, Marchamont Nehdham, and James Harrington, and by its sometime opponent and ultimate supporter Thomas Hobbes. This volume examines these four thinkers, situates them with regard to the novel species of republicanism first championed more than a century before by Niccolo Machiavelli, and examines the debt that he and they owed the Epicurean tradition in philosophy and the political science crafted by the Arab philosophers Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#472,429)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Anthony Rahe
Hillsdale College

Citations of this work

Needed but Unwanted. Thomas Hobbes’s Warnings on the Dangers of Multitude, Populism and Democracy.Mikko Jakonen - 2016 - Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política 5 (9):89-118.
Niccolò Machiavelli.Cary Nederman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Politics, Religion and Foundation in Machiavelli. A Reading from the Origins of Rome.Agustin Volco - 2016 - Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política 5 (9):285-310.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references