Montesquieu's natural rights constitutionalism
Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2):51-81 (2012)
| Abstract | When Woodrow Wilson, in the course of his campaign for the Presidency in 1912, attacked Thomas Jefferson and Charles-Louis de Secondat, baron de La Brfor the constitutionalism articulated by the latter and embraced, in turn, by the Framers of the American Constitution was a systematic attempt to put into practice something very much like the first principles spelled out in the Declaration of Independence. Montesquieu was not a doctrinaire. He feared that, in his own country and elsewhere, revolution would eventuate in the establishment of a despotism, and so he gently, quietly promoted unobtrusive reform. But the cautious, prudential political science that he outlined in his Spirit of Laws was anything but value-free. If the American framers found his legislative science of use, it was because the hatred of despotism and love for liberty animating its author was grounded in an account of natural right closely akin to the one, espoused in John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government, that had inspired their revolution | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHilary Bok, Baron de Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Sharon R. Krause (2006). Laws, Passion, and the Attractions of Right Action in Montesquieu. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):211-230.
Michael Zuckert (2005). Natural Rights and Imperial Constitutionalism: The American Revolution and the Development of the American Amalgam. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):27-55.
Charles Secondat Montesquiedeu (1989). The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge University Press.
Antoine Louis Claude Destutt de Tracy (1811/2006). A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu's Spirit of Laws: Prepared for Press From the Original. Lawbook Exchange.
Michael Zuckert (2001). Natural Law, Natural Rights, and Classical Liberalism: On Montesquieu's Critique of Hobbes. Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (1):227-251.
John Hasnas (2005). Toward a Theory of Empirical Natural Rights. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):111-147.
Céline Spector (2003). Montesquieu: Critique of Republicanism? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):38-53.
Rebecca Kingston (ed.) (2009). Montesquieu and His Legacy. State University of New York Press.
Henrik Syse (2007). Natural Law, Religion, and Rights: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Natural Law and Natural Rights, with Special Emphasis on the Teachings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. St. Augustine's Press.
Thomas L. Pangle (2010). The Theological Basis of Liberal Modernity in Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws. The University of Chicago Press.
Destutt de Tracy & Antoine Louis Claude (1811/2006). A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu's Spirit of Laws: Prepared for Press From the Original. Lawbook Exchange.
Charles de Secondat Montesquieu (1751/2005). The Spirit of Laws. Lawbook Exchange.
Michael Zuckert (2012). On the Separation of Powers: Liberal and Progressive Constitutionalism. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2):335-364.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-07-18Total downloads3 ( #201,838 of 549,066 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,066 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
