Synthese 125 (1-2):201-232 (2000)
|Abstract||Being a pragmatic and not a referential approach tosemantics, the dialogical formulation ofparaconsistency allows the following semantic idea tobe expressed within a semi-formal system: In anargumentation it sometimes makes sense to distinguishbetween the contradiction of one of the argumentationpartners with himself (internal contradiction) and thecontradiction between the partners (externalcontradiction). The idea is that externalcontradiction may involve different semantic contextsin which, say A and ¬A have been asserted.The dialogical approach suggests a way of studying thedynamic process of contradictions through which thetwo contexts evolve for the sake of argumentation intoone system containing both contexts.More technically, we show a new, dialogical, way tobuild paraconsistent systems for propositional andfirst-order logic with classical and intuitionisticfeatures (i.e. paraconsistency both with and withouttertium non-datur) and present theircorresponding tableaux.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ulrich Nortmann (2001). How to Extend the Dialogical Approach to Provability Logic. Synthese 127 (1-2):95 - 103.
Jean Paul Van Bendegem (2001). Paraconsistency and Dialogue Logic Critical Examination and Further Explorations. Synthese 127 (1-2):35-55.
Eveline T. Feteris (2000). A Dialogical Theory of Legal Discussions:Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Legalargumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):115-135.
Patrick Blackburn (2001). Modal Logic as Dialogical Logic. Synthese 127 (1-2):57 - 93.
Robert van Es & Tiemo L. Meijlink (2000). The Dialogical Turn of Public Relation Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):69-77.
Shahid Rahman & Helge Rückert (2001). Dialogical Connexive Logic. Synthese 127 (1-2):105 - 139.
Abraham Rudnick (2002). The Ground of Dialogical Bioethics. Health Care Analysis 10 (4):391-402.
A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (2003). Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion. Argumentation 17 (4):405-419.
Jean Paul Van Bendegem (2001). Paraconsistency and Dialogue Logic Critical Examination and Further Explorations. Synthese 127 (1/2):35 - 55.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #169,891 of 722,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?