David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 7 (2):123 – 132 (1997)
As most commentators on Japanese aesthetics agree, the Japanese aesthetic is pervaded by a profound affirmation of things in their suchness or original uniqueness, and at the same time is tinged with an element of sadness or melancholy. While the responses of affirmation and melancholy seem rather subjective and may—at first glance—appear inconsistent with Buddhist notions like anatman, or non-self and the Buddhist demand for non-attachment, I shall argue that a more careful reading of certain Buddhist doctrines, specifically the doctrine of dependent origination or pratitya-samutp da, reveals that the basic tenets of Buddhism are not only consistent with these sorts of subjective responses, but in fact serve to help explain the dual nature of the Japanese aesthetic. Accordingly, I shall suggest that given the undeniable influence Buddhism has had on Japanese culture, it seems likely that the doctrine of dependent origination is not only compatible with, but also contributed to the formation of what we regard as the Japanese aesthetic.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Toshihiko Izutsu (1981). The Theory of Beauty in the Classical Aesthetics of Japan. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Boston.
Midori Kagawa-Fox (2010). Environmental Ethics From the Japanese Perspective. Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (1):57 – 73.
Y. Saito (2010). Everyday Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
James Giles (ed.) (2008). Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought. Palgrave Macmillan.
Leah Kalmanson (2012). Buddhism and Bell Hooks: Liberatory Aesthetics and the Radical Subjectivity of No-Self. Hypatia 27 (4):810-827.
Michael Kurak (2003). The Relevance of the Buddhist Theory of Dependent Co-Origination to Cognitive Science. Brain and Mind 4 (3):341-351.
Eviatar Shulman (2008). Early Meanings of Dependent-Origination. Journal of Indian Philosophy 36 (2):297-317.
Steve Odin (1991). The Japanese Concept of Nature in Relation to the Environmental Ethics and Conservation Aesthetics of Aldo Leopold. Environmental Ethics 13 (4):345-360.
Added to index2009-02-01
Total downloads29 ( #135,244 of 1,796,307 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #348,557 of 1,796,307 )
How can I increase my downloads?