|Abstract||Lockean natural rights theories have long been associated with laissez-faire policies on the part of the government, in large measure because of the sanctity they accord to individual rights, especially private property rights. However, I will argue that if one attempts to apply such theories to moral questions about pollution, they present a different face, one set so firmly against laissez-faire -- or laissez-polluer -- as to countenance serious restriction of what Lockeans have traditionally taken to be the proper sphere of individual freedom.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Norman Horn (2009). Can the Government Solve Transportation Pollution? Ethics, Place and Environment 12 (2):149 – 156.
A. John Simmons (1998). Makers' Rights. Journal of Ethics 2 (3):197-218.
Robert E. Goodin (1990). Property Rights and Preservationist Duties. Inquiry 33 (4):401 – 432.
Rowan Cruft (2006). Against Individualistic Justifications of Property Rights. Utilitas 18 (2):154-172.
Karl Widerquist (2009). A Dilemma for Libertarianism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):43-72.
L. Wenar (1998). Original Acquisition of Private Property. Mind 107 (428):799-820.
Peter Vallentyne (2001). Self-Ownership. In Laurence Becker & Charlotte Becker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition. Garland Publishing.
James Tully (1980). A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge University Press.
Hugh Breakey (2010). Natural Intellectual Property Rights and the Public Domain. Modern Law Review 73 (2):208-239.
John Hasnas (2005). Toward a Theory of Empirical Natural Rights. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):111-147.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads124 ( #5,079 of 722,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,873 of 722,748 )
How can I increase my downloads?