Interdependence of law & morality
| Abstract | Law means a body of legal rules that are intended to alter behavior, Morality means rules of conduct that are associated with certain distinctive psychological and social attributes. the four pillars of classifying Law and Morality are Historical, Philosophical, Analytical, and Sociological. One can differentiate between LAW & MORALITY on their cost of establishment, their way of enforcement and nature of conduct. In many ways both LAW & MORALITY are dependent on each other. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesGovert den Hartogh (2002). Mutual Expectations: A Conventionalist Theory of Law. Kluwer Law International.
Matthew H. Kramer (2008). Where Law and Morality Meet. Oxford University Press.
Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov (2011). The Figuring of Morality in Adjudication: Not so Special? Ratio Juris 24 (3):284-303.
Joseph Raz (2003). About Morality and the Nature of Law. American Journal of Jurisprudence 48:1-15.
Baudouin Dupret (2011). Adjudication in Action: An Ethnomethodology of Law, Morality and Justice. Ashgate.
Robert Alexy (2002). The Argument From Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.
Leon Petrażycki (2010). Law and Morality. Translation Publishers.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads26 ( #48,439 of 556,840 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,840 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
