Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 108 (3):309 - 326 (2002)
|Abstract||I argue that any theory of moral obligation must be able to explain two things: why we cannot be thrust into a moral dilemma through no fault of our own, and why we can get into a moral dilemma through our own negligence. The most intuitive theory of moral obligation cannot do so. However, I offer a theory of moral obligation that satisfies both of these criteria, one that is founded on the principle that if you are required to do something, then you would be blameworthy for failing to do it. I conclude by relating these results to the current literature on moral dilemmas.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hugo Adam Bedau (1971). Military Service and Moral Obligation. Inquiry 14 (1-4):244 – 266.
Carol Hay (2005). Whether to Ignore Them and Spin: Moral Obligations to Resist Sexual Harassment. Hypatia 20 (4):94-108.
Barbara Herman (2007). Moral Literacy. Harvard University Press.
Stephen Darwall (2010). Moral Obligation: Form and Substance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (1):31-46.
Philip J. Nickel (2007). Trust and Obligation-Ascription. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (3):309 - 319.
Dale Jacquette (1991). Moral Dilemmas, Disjunctive Obligations, and Kant's Principle That 'Ought' Implies 'Can'. Synthese 88 (1):43 - 55.
William L. Langenfus (1988). A Problem for Harman's Moral Relativism. Philosophy Research Archives 14:121-136.
Margaret P. Gilbert (2004). Scanlon on Promissory Obligation. Journal of Philosophy 101 (2):83-109.
Ishtiyaque Haji (2010). Intrinsic Value, Alternative Possibilities, and Reason. Journal of Ethics 14 (2):149-171.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #78,107 of 739,353 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,353 )
How can I increase my downloads?