David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 82 (2):177-205 (1990)
Along with the increasing popularity of connectionist language models has come a number of provocative suggestions about the challenge these models present to Chomsky's arguments for nativism. The aim of this paper is to assess these claims. We begin by reconstructing Chomsky's argument from the poverty of the stimulus and arguing that it is best understood as three related arguments, with increasingly strong conclusions. Next, we provide a brief introduction to connectionism and give a quick survey of recent efforts to develop networks that model various aspects of human linguistic behavior. Finally, we explore the implications of this research for Chomsky's arguments. Our claim is that the relation between connectionism and Chomsky's views on innate knowledge is more complicated than many have assumed, and that even if these models enjoy considerable success the threat they pose for linguistic nativism is small
|Keywords||Connectionism Knowledge Language Nativism Chomsky, N|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert C. Berwick (1983). Using What You Know: A Computer-Science Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (3):402.
Noam Chomsky (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. The Mit Press.
Noam Chomsky (1988). Language and Problems of Knowledge. The Mit Press.
Noam A. Chomsky (1969). Linguistics and Philosophy. In Sidney Hook (ed.), Language and Philosophy. New York University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Saul Traiger (1994). The Secret Operations of the Mind. Minds and Machines 4 (3):303-315.
Similar books and articles
Joel W. Lidz & S. Waxman (2004). Reaffirming the Poverty of the Stimulus Argument: A Reply to the Replies. Cognition 93 (2):157-165.
Ullin T. Place (1992). Eliminative Connectionism: Its Implications for a Return to an Empiricist/Behaviorist Linguistics. Behavior and Philosophy 20 (1):21-35.
Christopher D. Green & John Vervaeke (1997). But What Have You Done for Us Lately?: Some Recent Perspectives on Linguistic Nativism. In David Martel Johnson & Christina E. Erneling (eds.), The Future of the Cognitive Revolution, Chapter 11. Oxford University Press. 149-163.
Andy Clark (1993). Minimal Rationalism. Mind 102 (408):587-610.
Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis (2001). The Poverty of the Stimulus Argument. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):217-276.
Tom Simpson, Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Amp Amp (2005). Introduction: Nativism Past and Present. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press New York.
Robert J. Matthews (2001). Cowie's Anti-Nativism. Mind and Language 16 (2):215-230.
Glen Hoffmann (2009). Nativism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):303-315.
Glen Hoffmann (2009). Nativism: In Defense of the Representational Interpretation. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (27):303-315.
Shaun Nichols (2005). Innateness and Moral Psychology. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press New York. 353--369.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads50 ( #36,554 of 1,140,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #64,318 of 1,140,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?