Prolegomena 5 (2):209-218 (2006)
|Abstract||Whether mathematical truths are syntactical (as Rudolf Carnap claimed) or empirical (as Mill actually never claimed, though Carnap claimed that he did) might seem merely an academic topic. However, it becomes a practical concern as soon as we consider the role of questions. For if we inquire as to the truth of a mathematical statement, this question must be (in a certain respect) meaningless for Carnap, as its truth or falsity is certain in advance due to its purely syntactical (or formal-semantical) nature. In contrast, for Mill such a question is as valid as any other. These differing views have their consequences for contemporary erotetic logic|
|Keywords||erotetic logic mathematical truth scientific inquiry|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rudolf Carnap (1943). Formalization of Logic. Cambridge, Mass.,Harvard University Press.
Kuipers, Theo A. F. & Wisniewski, Andrzej (1994). An Erotetic Approach to Explanation by Specification. Erkenntnis 40 (3):377-402.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1994). The Internal/External Question. Grazier Philosophishe Studien 47:31-41.
Jaakko Hintikka (ed.) (1975). Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives. D. Reidel Pub. Co..
Andrzej Wiśniewski (2003). Erotetic Search Scenarios. Synthese 134 (3):389 - 427.
James W. Comman (1964). Linguistig Frameworks and Metaphysical Questions. Inquiry 7 (1-4):129 – 142.
G. Ebbs (2011). Carnap and Quine on Truth by Convention. Mind 120 (478):193-237.
Gregory Lavers (2004). Carnap, Semantics and Ontology. Erkenntnis 60 (3):295-316.
Andrzej Wiśniewski (1999). Erotetic Logic and Explanation by Abnormic Hypotheses. Synthese 120 (3):295-309.
Gregory Lavers (2008). Carnap, Formalism, and Informal Rigour. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):4-24.
Added to index2009-07-25
Total downloads18 ( #68,478 of 556,772 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,403 of 556,772 )
How can I increase my downloads?