Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 108 (4):495 - 507 (2012)
|Abstract||We examine the impact on firm bribery of two corporate governance devices heavily studied in corporate governance research—i.e., separation of ownership and control, and equity share of the largest shareholder. In addition, we investigate the impact of the principal—owner's gender on firm bribery. From agency theory, we predict that firms with the owner also acting as a manager (owner-manager) are more likely to engage in bribery compared to their counterparts with separation of ownership and control. We argue that an increase of the equity share of the largest shareholder can either increase or decrease firm bribery likelihood depending on the net cost-benefit effect of such bribery actions. In addition, we predict that bribery is more likely to occur when the principal— owner is male rather than female. Using a rich dataset of the World Bank Enterprise Surveys of 2002-2005, we find that the equity share of the largest shareholder is negatively and male principal—owner is positively associated with the likelihood of firm bribery. Furthermore, we reveal that owner—manager is more likely to bribe when the principal— owner is male rather than female. We also observe that the effect of owner—manager is smaller as the equity share of the largest shareholder increases|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Yongqiang Gao (2011). Government Intervention, Perceived Benefit, and Bribery of Firms in Transitional China. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):175-184.
Peter Koslowski (2000). The Limits of Shareholder Value. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):137 - 148.
Xun Wu (2009). Determinants of Bribery in Asian Firms: Evidence From the World Business Environment Survey. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):75 - 88.
Kelly D. Martin, John B. Cullen & Jean L. Johnson, Deciding to Bribe: A Cross-Level Analysis of Firm and Home Country Influences on Bribery Activity.
Yin-Hua Yeh, Tsun-Siou Lee & Pei-Gi Shu (2008). The Agency Problems Embedded in Firm's Equity Investment. Journal of Business Ethics 79 (1/2):151 - 166.
Yanjing Chen, Mahmut Yaşar & Roderick M. Rejesus (2008). Factors Influencing the Incidence of Bribery Payouts by Firms: A Cross-Country Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2):231 - 244.
Fang Huang & John Rice (2012). Firm Networking and Bribery in China: Assessing Some Potential Negative Consequences of Firm Openness. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 107 (4):533-545.
Arthur Zucker (2000). Bribery and Extortion: Can Restaurants Help? Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):197-204.
Kathleen Rehbein, Jeanne M. Logsdon & Harry J. Buren (2013). Corporate Responses to Shareholder Activists: Considering the Dialogue Alternative. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 112 (1):137-154.
Bruce Walters, Tim Hardin & James Schick (1995). Top Executive Compensation: Equity or Excess? Implications for Regaining American Competitiveness. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (3):227 - 234.
Lorne N. Switzer & Catherine Kelly (2006). Corporate Governance Mechanisms and the Performance of Small-Cap Firms in Canada. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):294-328.
Kendall D'Andrade (1985). Bribery. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (4):239 - 248.
Wajeeh Elali (2006). Contemporaneous Relationship Between Eva and Shareholder Value. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):237-253.
Hoje Jo & Maretno A. Harjoto (2011). Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3):351-383.
Kathryn Gordon & Maiko Miyake (2001). Business Approaches to Combating Bribery: A Study of Codes of Conduct. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 34 (3-4):161 - 173.
Added to index2011-12-06
Total downloads17 ( #78,085 of 737,480 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,084 of 737,480 )
How can I increase my downloads?