David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Education 2 (2):95-107 (2007)
The new idea of a 'parenting contract', explicitly taking as its point of reference the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, is meant primarily to protect children's rights, and specifically the right to a proper upbringing. The nature of the parent-child relationship is thus drawn into the discourse of rights and duties. Although there is much to be said for parents explicitly attending to their children's upbringing, something of the uniqueness of the parent-child relationship seems to be occluded by the language of rights and duties as that relationship becomes narrowed down to the confines of a contractual agreement. What comes to be foregrounded in the parent-child relationship is a defence of the various parties'—the parents' and the child's—interests. By drawing on the work of Annette Baier, we argue that this has considerable consequences in terms of trust and distrust, and parental engagement. It is questioned whether the concept of the parenting contract brings about the positive climate of engagement which it is meant to promote
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Xianglong Zhang (2011). Kant's View on the Parent-Child Relationship and its Problems—Analyses From a Temporal Perspective as to the Creation and Rearing of a Being Endowed with Freedom. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (1):145-160.
Bas Levering (2011). 'The Interests of the Child' Seen From the Child's Perspective: The Case of the Netherlands. Ethics and Education 6 (2):109-123.
Helen Watt (2004). Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Choosing the “Good Enough” Child. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 12 (1):51-60.
Janet Malek (2013). Use or Refuse Reproductive Genetic Technologies: Which Would a 'Good Parent' Do? Bioethics 27 (2):59-64.
Simon Keller (2006). Four Theories of Filial Duty. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):254 - 274.
Stefan Ramaekers & Judith Suissa (2011). Parents as 'Educators': Languages of Education, Pedagogy and 'Parenting'. Ethics and Education 6 (2):197-212.
By Simon Keller (2006). Four Theories of Filial Duty. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):254–274.
David Archard (1990). Child Abuse: Parental Rights and the Interests of the Child. Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (2):183-194.
Bert Lambeir & Stefan Ramaekers (2007). The Terror of Explicitness: Philosophical Remarks on the Idea of a Parenting Contract. Ethics and Education 2 (2):95-107.
Added to index2010-07-27
Total downloads3 ( #220,749 of 1,010,219 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,700 of 1,010,219 )
How can I increase my downloads?