Weight or the value of knowledge
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (1):1-4 (1990)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesD. Pauly & KI Stergiou (2008). Re-Interpretation of ‘Influence Weight’ as a Citation-Based Index of New Knowledge (INK). Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8:75-78.
Edward M. Hubbard & Vilayanur S. Ramachandran (2004). The Size-Weight Illusion, Emulation, and the Cerebellum. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):407-408.
Keith Lehrer (2001). The Rationality of Dissensus: A Reply to Goodin. Journal of Ethics 5 (2):133-137.
Daan Evers (2013). Weight for Stephen Finlay. Philosophical Studies 163 (3):737-749.
Ross Cameron (2009). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Properties. In Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. Routledge.
Frederick Adams (1995). Trying. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:549-561.
Cressida J. Heyes (2006). Foucault Goes to Weight Watchers. Hypatia 21 (2):126-149.
Tomas Bogardus (2009). A Vindication of the Equal-Weight View. Episteme 6 (3):324-335.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #93,438 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
