Graduate studies at Western
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (3):241 – 253 (1993)
|Abstract||Abstract Philosophers have paid little attention to the kind of reduction involved in transforming an analytically intractable equation into solvable form. I argue that this practice is important because it involves the design of a basic level theory for use in a specific domain. The design process can lead to the construction of a new theory. As a result of my analysis, theory design emerges as an important category of analysis for scientific methodology. Similarities between design in technology and science are explored to illuminate the heuristic function of such reductions|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Noëmi Manders-Huits (2011). What Values in Design? The Challenge of Incorporating Moral Values Into Design. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):271-287.
Jeffry L. Ramsey (1995). Construction by Reduction. Philosophy of Science 62 (1):1-20.
Pawel Garbacz (2009). What is an Artefact Design? Techné 13 (2):137-149.
Reese M. Heitner (2000). Is Design Relative or Real? Dennett on Intentional Relativism and Physical Realism. Minds and Machines 10 (2):267-83.
Jürgen Friedrich (1996). Design Science 97. AI and Society 10 (2):199-217.
Peter Purgathofer (2006). Is Informatics a Design Discipline? Poiesis and Praxis 4 (4):303-314.
Lj Koskela & M. Kagioglou, The Proto-Theory of Design: The Method of Analysis of the Ancient Geometers.
Greg Bamford (1991). Design, Science and Conceptual Analysis. In Jim Plume (ed.), Architectural Science and Design in Harmony: Proceedings of the joint ANZAScA / ADTRA conference, Sydney, 10-12 July, 1990. School of Architecture, University of NSW.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #246,694 of 739,788 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?