David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Motilal Banarsidass Publishers (2007)
Ethics and the History of Indian Philosophy (Motilal Banarsidass 2007). Regretfully, it is not an uncommon view in orthodox Indology that Indian philosophers were not interested in ethics. This claim belies the fact that Indian philosophical schools were generally interested in the practical consequences of beliefs and actions. The most popular symptom of this concern is the doctrine of karma, according to which the consequences of actions have an evaluative valence. Ethics and the History of Indian Philosophy argues that the orthodox view in Indology concerning Indian ethics is false. The first half the book deals with theoretical issues in studying ethics: defining moral terms, understanding the subject matter of ethics so as to transcend culturally specific substantive commitments and touches upon issues of cross-cultural hermeneutics and translation. The second half consists of a systematic explication of the moral philosophical aspects of nine major Indian philosophical schools. I argue that “dharma” in its various uses in Indian philosophy is always rationally treated as a moral term—even in so called “ontological” employments of the term as seen in Buddhism and Jainism. In understanding “dharma” in this manner, the Indian philosophical tradition is replete with different versions of moral realism that fit tidily with other philosophical commitments of Indian philosophers. Pains are taken to show the breath of moral philosophical disagreement in this tradition. On a comparative note, some Indian moral philosophy resembles realist approaches of the Western tradition (such as the Non-natural realism of Neo-Platonism, or the Naturalism of Utilitarianism). Out of the major Indian philosophical schools, a slim minority are shown to be committed to moral irrealism while some are shown to regard their entire philosophical orientation as firmly planted within moral philosophy (such as Jainism, Buddhism, Purva Mimamsa and Yoga). In response to those who would argue that what Indian philosophers meant by “dharma” is very different from what moral philosophers in the West have meant by “ethical” or “good,” I argue that this is as vacuous as noting that Utilitarians have a different conception of the good from Deontologists. If philosophy is concerned with theoretical debate, as I argue it is, philosophical terms function to articulate such disagreements. The various seemingly desperate uses of “dharma” in the Indian tradition are no longer confusing or disorderly when we understand the theoretico-philosophical function of this term in Indian philosophical disputes.
|Keywords||Dharma Indian Philosophy Ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$53.78 direct from Amazon (10% off) $99.99 new $166.04 used Amazon page|
|Call number||B132.D5.R36 2007|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Shyam Ranganathan (2011). An Archimedean Point for Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 42 (4):479-519.
Similar books and articles
Daya Krishna (1991). Indian Philosophy: A Counter Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Rajendra Prasad (2008). A Conceptual-Analytic Study of Classical Indian Philosophy of Morals. Jointly Published by Centre for Studies in Civilization and Concept Pub. Co. For the Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy, and Culture.
G. S. Brett (1934). Book Review:A History of Indian Philosophy. Surendranath Dasgupta; Indian Idealism. Surendranath Dasgupta; Outlines of Indian Philosophy. M. Hiriyanna; History of Indian Philosophy. Vol. VII. Indian Mysticism. S. K. Belvalkar, R. D. Ranade. [REVIEW] Ethics 45 (1):102.
Desh Raj Sirswal (ed.) (2012). Reconsidering Classical Indian Thoughts. Centre for Positive Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Studies (CPPIS).
Roy W. Perrett (1998). Truth, Relativism and Western Conceptions of Indian Philosophy. Asian Philosophy 8 (1):19 – 29.
Desh Raj Sirswal (2015). Place of Logic in Indian Philosophy. Lokayata: Journal of Positive Philosophy 2:39-49.
Sue Hamilton (2001). Indian Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Shyam Ranganathan, Hindu Philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #417,610 of 1,780,972 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,797 of 1,780,972 )
How can I increase my downloads?