David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (1):33-47 (1997)
Recent interpretations of Michel Foucault's work have leaned heavily on a reading that can be traced back to the 'vital ist/mechanist' debate in the philosophy of science from earlier in this century. Friends (Gilles Deleuze) and enemies (Jürgen Habermas) both read Foucault as a kind of vitalist, championing repressed and unrealized life-forces against a burdensome facticity. This reading of Foucault, however, comes with a prohibitively high cost: the giving up of Foucault's most trenchant insights regarding the nature of power. In fact, Foucault has a quite different relation to the history and philosophy of science than the one ascribed to him by critics. Key Words: Bergson Canguilhem Foucault opposition vitalism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
José Guilherme Merquior (1985). Foucault. University of California Press.
Arnold Ira Davidson (ed.) (1997). Foucault and His Interlocutors. University of Chicago Press.
Jon Simons (1995). Foucault & the Political. Routledge.
Sara Mills (2003). Michel Foucault. Routledge.
Dieter Freundlieb (1988). Rationalism V. Irrationalism? Habermas's Response to Foucault. Inquiry 31 (2):171 – 192.
Ronald Beiner (1995). Foucault's Hyper‐Liberalism. Critical Review 9 (3):349-370.
Geoff Danaher (2000). Understanding Foucault. Sage Publications.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #91,827 of 1,907,930 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #195,286 of 1,907,930 )
How can I increase my downloads?