Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (1):33-47 (1997)
|Abstract||Recent interpretations of Michel Foucault's work have leaned heavily on a reading that can be traced back to the 'vital ist/mechanist' debate in the philosophy of science from earlier in this century. Friends (Gilles Deleuze) and enemies (Jürgen Habermas) both read Foucault as a kind of vitalist, championing repressed and unrealized life-forces against a burdensome facticity. This reading of Foucault, however, comes with a prohibitively high cost: the giving up of Foucault's most trenchant insights regarding the nature of power. In fact, Foucault has a quite different relation to the history and philosophy of science than the one ascribed to him by critics. Key Words: Bergson Canguilhem Foucault opposition vitalism.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
José Guilherme Merquior (1985/1987). Foucault. University of California Press.
Ronald Beiner (1995). Foucault's Hyper‐Liberalism. Critical Review 9 (3):349-370.
Dieter Freundlieb (1988). Rationalism V. Irrationalism? Habermas's Response to Foucault. Inquiry 31 (2):171 – 192.
Sara Mills (2003). Michel Foucault. Routledge.
Jon Simons (1995). Foucault & the Political. Routledge.
Arnold Ira Davidson (ed.) (1997). Foucault and His Interlocutors. University of Chicago Press.
Geoff Danaher (2000). Understanding Foucault. Sage Publications.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #33,743 of 739,306 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,306 )
How can I increase my downloads?