Graduate studies at Western
History and Philosophy of Logic 5 (1):49-66 (1984)
|Abstract||In this essay, I discuss some observations by Peirce which suggest he had some idea of the substantive metalogical differences between logics which permit both quantifiers and relations, and those which do not. Peirce thus seems to have had arguments?which even De Morgan and Frege lacked?that show the superior expressiveness of relational logics|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edward N. Zalta, Frege's Logic, Theorem, and Foundations for Arithmetic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Richard Heck (2011). A Logic for Frege's Theorem. In Frege's Theorem. Oxford University Press.
Emily Michael (1974). Peirce's Early Study of the Logic of Relations, 1865-1867. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 10 (2):63 - 75.
R. M. Martin (1976). Some Comments on DeMorgan, Peirce, and the Logic of Relations. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12 (3):223 - 230.
Daniel D. Merrill (1978). DeMorgan, Peirce and the Logic of Relations. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 14 (4):247 - 284.
Paul Oppenheimer & Edward N. Zalta (2011). Relations Vs Functions at the Foundations of Logic: Type-Theoretic Considerations. Journal of Logic and Computation 21:351-374.
Maarten De Rijke (1995). The Logic of Peirce Algebras. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (3):227-250.
J. Brent Crouch (2010). Between Frege and Peirce: Josiah Royce's Structural Logicism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (2):155-177.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads16 ( #82,020 of 752,392 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #38,079 of 752,392 )
How can I increase my downloads?