Relations between three-dimensional, volumetric experiences, and neural processes: Limitations of materialism
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):422-422 (2003)
|Abstract||Certain features of perception – the quale red, for example, and other qualia – must be regarded as additions to the materialist neurophysiological picture of perception. The perception of three-dimensional volumetric objects can also be seen as qualitative additions to the neurophysiological processes in the brain, possibly without additions to the information content.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ichiro Tsuda (2001). Toward an Interpretation of Dynamic Neural Activity in Terms of Chaotic Dynamical Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):793-810.
Greg Janzen (2008). Bennett and Hacker on Neural Materialism. Acta Analytica 23 (3):273-286.
Boyd Millar (2006). The Conflicted Character of Picture Perception. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):471–477.
Melvyn A. Goodale & K. Murphy (2000). Space in the Brain: Different Neural Substrates for Allocentric and Egocentric Frames of Reference. In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Neural Correlates of Consciousness. MIT Press.
Dan Lloyd (2003). Double Trouble for Gestalt Bubbles. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):417-418.
Dan Cavedon-Taylor (2011). Perceptual Content and Sensorimotor Expectations. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243):383-391.
Márk Molnár (2001). Low-Dimensional Versus High-Dimensional Chaos in Brain Function – is It an and/or Issue? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):823-824.
Victor Rosenthal & Yves-Marie Visetti (2003). Gestalt Bubble and the Genesis of Space. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):424-424.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #232,382 of 549,060 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?