David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (2):275-285 (2001)
Economic thinking is largely the construction of models and their use in various cognitive activities. So, understanding the conduct of inquiry in economics requires understanding economic models and their various uses. This paper connects models to a somewhat improved version of Laudan's distinction between mini-theories and global theories. Specifically, the paper indicates that economic models are mini-theories, and says something about the relations between models and the broader networks of beliefs that constitute global theories in economics. But the claim that models are mini-theories is intended as an initial and only partial account of the nature of models. As this paper indicates, viewing models as minitheories leaves room for adopting some further, more penetrating account of the nature of models, and underdetermines the choice as to which more profound account of models is selected.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
L. Laudan (1977). Progress and its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. University of California Press.
Clark Glymour (1980). Theory and Evidence. Princeton University Press.
Ronald N. Giere (1999). Science Without Laws. University of Chicago Press.
D. M. Hausman (1992). The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Spiro Latsis (1981). Method and Appraisal in Economics. Noûs 15 (2):225-230.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Axel Leijonhufvud (1997). Models and Theories. Journal of Economic Methodology 4 (2):193-198.
James E. Taylor (2007). Response to Ted Peters' “Models of God”. Philosophia 35 (3-4):289-292.
Stephan Hartmann (1995). Models as a Tool for Theory Construction: Some Strategies of Preliminary Physics. In William Herfel et al (ed.), Theories and Models in Scientific Processes. Rodopi
Robert I. Damper (2001). Programs, Models, Theories, and Reality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1055-1056.
Julian Reiss (2012). The Explanation Paradox. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (1):43-62.
Stathis Psillos (2011). Living with the Abstract: Realism and Models. Synthese 180 (1):3 - 17.
Steven Rappaport (1995). Economic Models and Historical Explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (4):421-441.
Wesley J. Wildman (2007). Behind, Between, and Beyond Anthropomorphic Models of Ultimate Reality. Philosophia 35 (3-4):407-425.
Andrew Jerome Dell’Olio (2007). Response to Wesley J. Wildman's “Behind, Between, and Beyond Anthropomorphic Models of Ultimate Reality”. Philosophia 35 (3-4):427-432.
Till Grüne-Yanoff (2009). Learning From Minimal Economic Models. Erkenntnis 70 (1):81 - 99.
Steven French (2000). Models, Theories, and Structures: Thirty Years On. Philosophy of Science 67 (S1):S116 - S127.
Nevin Cavusoglu & Edinaldo Tebaldi (2006). Evaluating Growth Theories and Their Empirical Support: An Assessment of the Convergence Hypothesis. Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (1):49-75.
Newton da Costa & Steven French (2000). Models, Theories, and Structures: Thirty Years On. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):127.
B. Hart, A. Pillay & S. Starchenko (1995). 1-Based Theories — the Main Gap for a -Models. Archive for Mathematical Logic 34 (5):285-300.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads10 ( #227,665 of 1,724,953 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,623 of 1,724,953 )
How can I increase my downloads?