David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (4):289 - 298 (1982)
Philosophy has been characterized (e.g., by Benson Mates) as a field whose problems are unsolvable. This has often been taken to mean that there can be no progress in philosophy as there is in mathematics or science. The nature of problems and solutions is considered, and it is argued that solutions are always parts of theories, hence that acceptance of a solution requires commitment to a theory (as suggested by William Perry's scheme of cognitive development). Progress can be had in philosophy in the same way as in mathematics and science by knowing what commitments are needed for solutions. Similar views of Rescher and Castañeda are discussed.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Leslie Sklair (1968). Gomte and the Idea of Progress. Inquiry 11 (1-4):321 – 331.
Vladimir V. Mironov (2013). On Progress in Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):10-14.
Vadim V. Vasilyev (2013). Philosophy of Mind, Past and Present. Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):15-18.
Eric Dietrich (2011). There Is No Progress in Philosophy. Essays in Philosophy 12 (2):9.
Paul M. Quay (1974). Progress as a Demarcation Criterion for the Sciences. Philosophy of Science 41 (2):154-170.
Ernan McMullin (1979). Laudan's Progress and Its Problems. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 46 (4):623 - 644.
Gerald Morgan (1982). Systems Theory: Philosophical and Methodological Problems I. V. Blauberg, V. N. Sadovsky, and E. G. Yudin Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1977. Pp. 318. $5.50Mankind and the Year 2000 V. Kosolapov Moscow: Progress Publishers (Current Problems Series), 1976. Pp. 236. $3.25. [REVIEW] Dialogue 21 (02):336-342.
Barbara Von Eckardt (1990). Some Remarks on Laudan's Theory of Scientific Rationality. Journal of Philosophical Research 15:153-167.
Moti Mizrahi (2013). What is Scientific Progress? Lessons From Scientific Practice. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 44 (2):375-390.
Robert Wachbroit (1986). Progress: Metaphysical and Otherwise. Philosophy of Science 53 (3):354-371.
Karen Momdjan (2013). Does Current Social Philosophy Develop Progressively? Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):19-23.
David L. Hull, Andrew Lugg, Robert E. Butts & I. C. Jarvie (1979). Review Symposium : Laurens Laudan. Progress and its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press, 1977. Pp. X + 257.Laudan's Progress and its Problems. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (4):457-465.
Michael Ruse (1978). Problems of Scientific Revolution: Progress and Obstacles to Progress in the Sciences. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 13 (1):407-416.
Yvonne Donders (2011). The Right to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific Progress: In Search of State Obligations in Relation to Health. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (4):371-381.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads10 ( #152,182 of 1,099,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #51,477 of 1,099,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?