Yes, She Was! Reply to Ford’s “Helen KellerWas Never in a Chinese Room”

Minds and Machines 21 (1):3-17 (2011)
Abstract
Ford’s Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room claims that my argument in How Helen Keller Used Syntactic Semantics to Escape from a Chinese Room fails because Searle and I use the terms ‘syntax’ and ‘semantics’ differently, hence are at cross purposes. Ford has misunderstood me; this reply clarifies my theory
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11023-010-9213-z
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive William Rapaport, Yes, She Was! Reply to Ford’s “Helen KellerWas Never in a Chinese Room”
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-11-18

Total downloads

188 ( #17,260 of 1,793,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

39 ( #21,230 of 1,793,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.