Yes, She Was!

Minds and Machines 21 (1):3-17 (2011)
Abstract
Ford’s Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room claims that my argument in How Helen Keller Used Syntactic Semantics to Escape from a Chinese Room fails because Searle and I use the terms ‘syntax’ and ‘semantics’ differently, hence are at cross purposes. Ford has misunderstood me; this reply clarifies my theory
Keywords Chinese room argument  Syntactic semantics  Searle
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,351
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    View all 18 references

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    William J. Rapaport (2000). How to Pass a Turing Test. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (4):467-490.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-12-27

    Total downloads

    4 ( #198,532 of 1,088,374 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    3 ( #30,936 of 1,088,374 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.