Graduate studies at Western
The Review of Metaphysics 62 (4):875-908 (2009)
|Abstract||This essay presents a brief summary of the Sen/Nussbaum conception of liberalism, offers some main points of criticism, and contrasts their conception of human flourishing and politics with an alternative one. The ultimate aim will be to show that they do not advance the cause of liberalism properly understood but actually retreat from it. The “human capabilities argument,” “public reasoning,” “internalist essentialism,” and other key concepts are discussed. The paper concludes that Sen and Nussbaum fail to adequately defend the premises of the human capabilities argument and that their argument invites a retreat from liberalism. Moreover, on their theory individuals have no basis upon which to erect borders for their resources or themselves and to say to any and all that some areas are off limits no matter who may benefit. Rather, there is only the relentless and enforced pursuit of capabilities|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Yuko Kamishima (2008). Can Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach Be a Foundation of Politically Liberal Theory of Justice? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:293-298.
Alan Ryan (2007). Newer Than What? Older Than What? Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):1-15.
Tony Fitzpatrick (2008). From Contracts to Capabilities and Back Again. Res Publica 14 (2):83-100.
Matthias Katzer (2010). The Basis of Universal Liberal Principles in Nussbaum’s Political Philosophy. Public Reason 2 (2):61-76.
Roger Paden (1997). Consumerism, the Procedural Republic, and the Unencumbered Self. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 4 (1/2):33-40.
Brenda Almond (1994). The Retreat From Liberty. Critical Review 8 (2):235-246.
Howard Schonberger (1982). U. S. Policy in Post-War Japan: The Retreat From Liberalism. Science and Society 46 (1):39 - 59.
Thomas M. Besch (2012). Political Liberalism, the Internal Conception, and the Problem of Public Dogma. Philosophy and Public Issues 2 (1):153-177.
Kevin Vallier (2012). Liberalism, Religion And Integrity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):149 - 165.
Sridhar Venkatapuram (2013). Health, Vital Goals, and Central Human Capabilities. Bioethics 27 (5):271-279.
Jon Mahoney (2004). Public Reason and the Moral Foundation of Liberalism. Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (3):311-331.
Herlinde Pauer-studer (2001). Liberalism, Perfectionism, and Civic Virtue. Philosophical Explorations 4 (3):174 – 192.
Marianna Papastephanou (2004). The Implicit Assumptions of Dividing a Cake: Political or Comprehensive? [REVIEW] Human Studies 27 (3):307-334.
John Gray (2000). Mill's Liberalism and Liberalism's Posterity. Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):137-165.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads4 ( #189,291 of 739,369 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,288 of 739,369 )
How can I increase my downloads?