David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Polish Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):117-136 (2011)
In this text the author draws on two contemporary accounts of power—by Michel Foucault and Ernesto Laclau—and, on the basis of thorough analysis and comparison, he argues for “the discursive account of power” (DAP) as a new concept reflecting the novel approach to the theory of power developed by these two philosophers. He opens with a broad methodological outline of contemporary concepts of power, distinguishing between the “classical” and the “modern” approaches. Basing his findings on Laclau’s and Foucault’s work, he then presents DAP as a theory characterized by decentralizing, non-normative, and conflict-based tendencies that does not exhibit many of the limitations that usually characterize both classical and modern concepts of power. In the second part of the article the author presents a detailed methodological analysis of Foucault’s and Laclau’s concepts of power, focusing on three axes: power, discourse, and the subject. The author dedicates the last section to a comparison of both approaches, concluding that DAP is an inspiring project that exceeds the limits of traditional liberal theories of power and politics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A. W. McHoul (1993/1998). A Foucault Primer: Discourse, Power, and the Subject. University of Otago Press.
Andrew Garnar (2006). Power, Action, Signs: Between Peirce and Foucault. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):347-366.
Kathleen Ennis, Michel Foucault and Judith Butler: Troubling Butler's Appropriation of Foucault's Work.
Ian Burkitt (1993). Overcoming Metaphysics: Elias and Foucault on Power and Freedom. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):50-72.
Robert Nola (1994). Post-Modernism, a French Cultural Chernobyl: Foucault on Power/Knowledge. Inquiry 37 (1):3 – 43.
Judith Butler (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford University Press.
Ellen K. Feder (2004). The Discursive Production of the “Dangerous Individual”. Radical Philosophy Review 7 (1):17-39.
Wolfgang Detel (2005). Foucault and Classical Antiquity: Power, Ethics, and Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Hans Sluga (1985). Foucault, the Author, and the Discourse. Inquiry 28 (1-4):403 – 415.
Amy Allen (2002). Power, Subjectivity, and Agency: Between Arendt and Foucault. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (2):131 – 149.
Ciaran Cronin (1996). Bourdieu and Foucault on Power and Modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (6):55-85.
Thomas Aastrup Rømer (2011). Postmodern Education and the Concept of Power. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (7):755-772.
Neve Gordon (2002). On Visibility and Power: An Arendtian Corrective of Foucault. [REVIEW] Human Studies 25 (2):125-145.
Antonio Calcagno (2009). Foucault and Derrida: The Question of Empowering and Disempowering the Author. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (1):33 - 51.
Dave Elder-Vass (2011). The Causal Power of Discourse. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (2):143-160.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads26 ( #148,221 of 1,796,560 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #55,101 of 1,796,560 )
How can I increase my downloads?