Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Philosophical Research 24:57-112 (1999)
|Abstract||Łukasiewicz distinguishes three formulations of the principle of contradiction in Aristotle’s works: ontological, logical, and psychological. The first two formulations are equivalent though not synonymous, but neither of them is equivalent to the psychological one, which expresses not a principle but only an empirical law. Furthermore, the principle of contradiction is neither a simple and ultimate law nor is it necessary for conducting an inference, because the syllogism is independent of it. The further explanation of this concept leads Łukasiewicz to formulate the idea of a non-Aristotelian logic, that is, a logic operating without the principle of contradiction. If the principle of contradiction shall be valid, it must be proved. A proof can be supplied only on the basis of a definition of object, as something that cannot have and not have the same property at the same time. However, this definition does not hold for all objects, i.e., for contradictory objects. In virtue of its ontological character the Aristotelian principle of contradiction is then different from that of symbolic logic|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tuomas E. Tahko (2009). The Law of Non-Contradiction as a Metaphysical Principle. Australasian Journal of Logic 7:32-47.
S. Marc Cohen (1986). Aristotle on the Principle of Non-Contradiction. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):359-370.
Izydora Dąmbska (1990). Łukasiewicz and Wittgenstein on the Principle of Contradiction. Dialectics and Humanism 17 (1):25-29.
A. C. H. Wright (1984). Verificationism and the Principle of Non-Contradiction. History and Philosophy of Logic 5 (2):195-217.
Józef Andrzej Stuchliński (1994). Pragmatyczno-logiczna zasada sprzeczności. W obronie Arystotelesa. Filozofia Nauki 1.
Alfonso García Marqués (2007). Sentido y Contradicción. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:127-136.
Michael V. Wedin (2004). Aristotle on the Firmness of the Principle of Non-Contradiction. Phronesis 49 (3):225 - 265.
Ben Kimpel (1934). A Critique of the Logic of Contradiction as the Exclusive Principle of Interpretation in an Idealistic Metaphysic. Scottdale, Pa.,Printed by the Mennonite Press.
Michael Wedin (2004). Aristotle on the Firmness of the Principle of Non-Contradiction. Phronesis 49 (3):225-265.
Alan Code (1986). Aristotle's Investigation of a Basic Logical Principle: Which Science Investigates the Principle of Non-Contradiction? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):341 - 357.
Graham Priest, Jc Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.) (2004). The Law of Non-Contradiction : New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
Karin de Boer (2010). Hegel's Account of Contradiction in the Science of Logic Reconsidered. Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):345-373.
Dirk Baltzly (1999). Aristotle and Platonic Dialectic in Metaphysics Gamma. Apeiron 32 (4):171-202.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads14 ( #90,533 of 739,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,475 of 739,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?