David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 45 (1):35 – 57 (2002)
This essay begins with an outline of the early Heidegger's distinction between beings and the Being1 of those beings, followed by a discussion of Heideggerian teleology. It then turns to contemporary analytic metaphysics to suggest that analytic metaphysics concerns itself wholly with beings and does not recognize distinct forms of questioning concerning what Heidegger calls Being . This difference having been clarified, studies of identity and individuation in the analytic tradition are examined and it is demonstrated that such inquiries have far more in common with Heidegger than one might initially suspect. Indeed, it turns out that much of what the early Heidegger says about Being is tacitly presupposed by the workings of certain being-centric metaphysical projects in the analytic tradition. The discussion concludes with the suggestion that the central difference between the two projects should be understood as one of emphasis and that Heidegger's discussion of Being and a realist metaphysics in the analytic tradition can complement each other as aspects of a broader, more unified philosophical inquiry.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jussi Backman (2007). All of a Sudden: Heidegger and Plato's Parmenides. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):393-408.
Iain Thomson (2000). Ontotheology? Understanding Heidegger's Destruktion of Metaphysics. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (3):297 – 327.
Carleton B. Christensen (2008). Self and World - From Analytic Philosophy to Phenomenology. Walter de Gruyter.
David J. Schenk (2006). Heidegger's B-Theoretic Phenomenology. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):219-233.
Michael Esfeld (2001). What Can Heidegger's Being and Time Tell Today's Analytic Philosophy? Philosophical Explorations 4 (1):46 – 62.
Richard Capobianco (2005). Heidegger's Turn Toward Home. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (1):155-173.
James Wood (2010). Contra Heidegger. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (1):221-247.
Mark Sacks (1990). Through a Glass Darkly: Vagueness in the Metaphysics of the Analytic Tradition. In David Bell & Neil Cooper (eds.), The Analytic Tradition: Roots and Scope. Blackwell.
Stephan Käufer (2005). The Nothing and the Ontological Difference in Heidegger's What is Metaphysics? Inquiry 48 (6):482 – 506.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #60,461 of 1,679,326 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #60,347 of 1,679,326 )
How can I increase my downloads?