Is International Law Impartial?
Legal Theory 11 (1):39-74 (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJack L. Goldsmith (2007). The Limits of International Law. Oxford University Press.
Samantha Besson & John Tasioulas (eds.) (2010). The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford University Press.
Steven Ratner (2009). Do International Organizations Play Favorites?: An Imparttialist Account. In Lukas Meyer (ed.), Legitimacy, Justice, and Public International Law. Cambridge University Press.
Michael H. Robins (1985). Is Fishkins's Critique of Impartial Consequentialism Impartial? Tulane Studies in Philosophy 33:21-26.
George P. Fletcher (2007). The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative, and International. Oxford University Press.
Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.) (2010). International Criminal Law and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Robert E. Goodin (2005). Toward an International Rule of Law: Distinguishing International Law-Breakers From Would-Be Law-Makers. Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2):225 - 246.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-08-08Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
