David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Research 33:235-251 (2008)
The thought that truth is valuable for its own sake is obvious, yet difficult to explicate in a precise and vindicating way. The paper tries to explicate and vindicate this thought with an argument for the conclusion that truth is an epistemic value. Truth is an epistemic value in the sense that a commitment to the value of truth plays a role in the justification and explanation of a fundamental aspect of our epistemic practice, namely, critical reflection. The paper also argues that this feature of truth is inconsistent with deflationary accounts of truth. The ideas are set against the backdrop of criticism of some recent work by Paul Horwich
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Horwich (2009). Truth-Meaning-Reality. Oxford University Press.
A. Wellmer (2003). The Debate About Truth: Pragmatism Without Regulative Ideas. Critical Horizons 4 (1):29-54.
James Beebe (2007). Reliabilism and Antirealist Theories of Truth. Erkenntnis 66 (3):375 - 391.
Panu Raatikainen (2005). On Horwich's Way Out. Analysis 65 (287):175-177.
Peter J. Graham (2011). Does Justification Aim at Truth? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):51-72.
Earl Conee (1998). Seeing the Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (4):847-857.
Barry Allen (2012). Aristotle on the Nature of Truth. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (1):135-136.
Hamid Vahid (2006). Aiming at Truth: Doxastic Vs. Epistemic Goals. Philosophical Studies 131 (2):303-335.
Steven Hendley (2006). Habermas Between Metaphysical and Natural Realism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (4):521 – 537.
Glen Hoffmann (2010). The Minimalist Theory of Truth: Challenges and Concerns. Philosophy Compass 5 (10):938-949.
Chase B. Wrenn (2010). True Belief is Not Instrumentally Valuable. In Cory D. Wright & Nikolaj J. L. L. Pedersen (eds.), New Waves in Truth. Palgrave Macmillan
Cesare Cozzo (1994). What Can We Learn From the Paradox of Knowability? Topoi 13 (2):71--78.
Tadeusz Szubka (2003). Epistemiczna koncepcja prawdy a relatywizm. Filozofia Nauki 3.
Michael P. Lynch (2009). Truth as One and Many. Clarendon Press.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads32 ( #131,452 of 1,934,372 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #91,718 of 1,934,372 )
How can I increase my downloads?