David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (1):97 - 118 (2012)
This paper defends two main claims. First: although it is easy to lose sight of this, what cost-benefit analysis really demands, in order to approve of a prospective policy, is that it be possible for those who would gain through the policy change to compensate those who would lose through it. And second: in cases where a policy change does, or can reasonably be expected to, lead to someone's death, the demand of compensability is much harder to satisfy than economists typically think. More specifically, their standard move?maintaining that compensability should be judged ex ante, and that it is thus really just risk of death, not death itself, that must be (and often is) compensable?is unsuccessful. Then, the implications of these claims are briefly explored
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (2009). A Theory of Justice. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press 133-135.
John Broome & Adam Morton (1994). The Value of a Person. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 68 (1):167 - 198.
Jonathan Wolff (2007). What is the Value of Preventing a Fatality? In Tim Lewens (ed.), Risk: Philosophical Perspectives. Routledge
Ty Raterman (2007). On the Role of Preferences and Values in Public Decisions. Social Theory and Practice 33 (2):251-276.
Michael W. Jones-lee (2007). Weighing Lives – an Applied Economist's Perspective. Economics and Philosophy 23 (3):373-384.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Donald C. Hubin (1994). The Moral Justification of Benefit/Cost Analysis. Economics and Philosophy 10 (2):169.
Kristin Shrader‐Frechette (1992). Science, Democracy, and Public Policy. Critical Review 6 (2-3):255-264.
Sven Ove Hansson (2007). Philosophical Problems in Cost–Benefit Analysis. Economics and Philosophy 23 (2):163-183.
Donald C. Hubin (1993). Book Review:Thoughtful Economic Man: Essays on Rationality, Moral Rules and Benevolence. Gay Meeks. [REVIEW] Ethics 103 (3):572-.
Peter Railton (1982). Costs and Benefits of Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Response to Bantz and MacLean. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:261-271.
K. S. Shrader-Frechette (1982). Economics, Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis, and the Linearity Assumption. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:217 - 232.
Simon Glynn (1996). Ethical Issues in Environmental Decision Making and the Limitations of Cost/Benefit Analysis (CBA). Ethics and the Environment 1 (1):27 - 39.
Kenneth Anderson, The Assumptions Behind the Assumptions in the War on Terror: Risk Assessment as an Example of Foundational Disagreement in Counterterrorism Policy.
Matthew D. Adler & Eric A. Posner (eds.) (2001). Cost-Benefit Analysis: Legal, Economic, and Philosophical Perspectives. University of Chicago Press.
David Schmidtz (2001). A Place for Cost-Benefit Analysis. Noûs 35 (s1):148 - 171.
Shepley W. Orr (2007). Values, Preferences, and the Citizen-Consumer Distinction in Cost-Benefit Analysis. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (1):107-130.
James W. Evra (1984). Death. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (2).
Alex Voorhoeve (2014). Review of Matthew D. Adler: Well-Being and Fair Distribution. Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis. [REVIEW] Social Choice and Welfare 42 (1):245-54.
Richard S. Markovits (2005). Matthew D. Adler and Eric A. Posner, Eds., Cost‐Benefit Analysis: Legal, Economic, and Philosophical Perspectives:Cost‐Benefit Analysis: Legal, Economic, and Philosophical Perspectives. [REVIEW] Ethics 115 (3):593-642.
Colleen Murphy & Paolo Gardoni (2007). Determining Public Policy and Resource Allocation Priorities for Mitigating Natural Hazards: A Capabilities-Based Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4):489-504.
Added to index2012-03-28
Total downloads10 ( #346,598 of 1,911,350 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #455,910 of 1,911,350 )
How can I increase my downloads?