David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):179-202 (2005)
William James's theory of emotion is often criticized for placing too much emphasis on bodily feelings and neglecting the cognitive aspects of emotion. This paper suggests that such criticisms are misplaced. Interpreting James's account of emotion in the light of his later philosophical writings, I argue that James does not emphasize bodily feelings at the expense of cognition. Rather, his view is that bodily feelings are part of the structure of intentionality. In reconceptualizing the relationship between cognition and affect, James rejects a number of commonplace assumptions concerning the nature of our cognitive relationship with the world, assumptions that many of his critics take for granted
|Keywords||Cognition Emotion Epistemology Intentionality James, William|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Martha C. Nussbaum (2001). Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge University Press.
Martin Heidegger (1967). Being and Time. Oxford, Blackwell.
Martin Heidegger (1962). Being and Time. London, Scm Press.
Paul E. Griffiths (1997). What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Bennett W. Helm (2015). Emotions and Recalcitrance: Reevaluating the Perceptual Model. Dialectica 69 (3):417-433.
Michelle Maiese (2015). Thought Insertion as a Disownership Symptom. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (4):911-927.
Michelle Maiese (2014). How Can Emotions Be Both Cognitive and Bodily? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (4):513-531.
Michelle Maiese (forthcoming). Transformative Learning, Enactivism, and Affectivity. Studies in Philosophy and Education:1-20.
Larry A. Herzberg (2009). Direction, Causation, and Appraisal Theories of Emotion. Philosophical Psychology 22 (2):167 – 186.
Similar books and articles
Max Carl Otto (ed.) (1942). William James. Madison, the University of Wisconsin Press.
Joel J. Kupperman (1995). An Anti-Essentialist View of the Emotions. Philosophical Psychology 8 (4):341-351.
Henry Jackman (1998). James' Pragmatic Account of Intentionality and Truth. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (1):155-181.
Marc A. Cohen (2008). The Two-Stage Model of Emotion and the Interpretive Structure of the Mind. Journal of Mind and Behavior 29 (4):291-320.
Jack Barbalet (2004). Hypothesis, Faith, and Commitment: William James' Critique of Science. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (3):213–230.
Gerald E. Myers (1969). William James's Theory of Emotion. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 5 (2):67-89.
Demian Whiting (2006). Standing Up for an Affective Account of Emotion. Philosophical Explorations 9 (3):261-276.
Jan Slaby (2008). Affective Intentionality and the Feeling Body. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (4):429-444.
Joseph T. Palencik (2007). William James and the Psychology of Emotions: From 1884 to the Present. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):769 - 786.
Giovanna Colombetti & Evan Thompson (forthcoming). The Feeling Body: Towards an Enactive Approach to Emotion. In W. F. Overton, U. Mueller & J. Newman (eds.), Body in Mind, Mind in Body: Developmental Perspectives on Embodiment and Consciousness. Erlbaum
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads137 ( #27,437 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #92,032 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?