Asian Philosophy 12 (2):97 – 108 (2002)
|Abstract||The article deals with the differences of the notion of 'object' or 'thing' in natural languages, concluding that some languages are by their structure more object-biased while others are more event-biased and proceeds to analyse how two common Japanese words, mono and koto , both meaning 'thing', have been treated in 20th-century Japanese thought, notably in the philosophical works of Watsuji Tetsurô, Ide Takashi, Hiromatsu Wataru and Kimura Bin. All of these thinkers represent different schools and trends (Watsuji could be called a cultural particularist, Ide was an Aristotle scholar, Hiromatsu a Marxist and Kimura is a psychiatrist), but come to similar conclusions in this respect, allowing us to regard event-biased and object-biased linguistic constructions as manifestations of two different, but equally necessary cognitive faculties.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eric Marcus (2006). Events, Sortals, and the Mind-Body Problem. Synthese 150 (1):99-129.
Robert Pasnau (2009). The Event of Color. Philosophical Studies 142 (3):353 - 369.
Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska (1989). On the Eliminatibility of Ideal Linguistic Entities. Studia Logica 48 (4):587 - 615.
Lila Gleitmanb, When English Proposes What Greek Presupposes: The Cross-Linguistic Encoding of Motion Events.
Anna Papafragou, When English Proposes What Greek Presupposes: The Cross-Linguistic Encoding of Motion Events.
Shaun P. Vecera (2000). Toward a Biased Competition Account of Object-Based Segregation and Attention. Brain and Mind 1 (3):353-384.
Laura Lakusta & Barbara Landau (2012). Language and Memory for Motion Events: Origins of the Asymmetry Between Source and Goal Paths. Cognitive Science 36 (3):517-544.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #133,587 of 549,528 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,528 )
How can I increase my downloads?