David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2009)
In the history of Western thought, Christian theology was once considered to be 'the Queen of Sciences'. Today it has been marginalised by a prevailing scepticism. Randal Rauser confronts the problem of developing a public voice for the theologian as engaged in true theological science while not compromising the commitment to the Christian community of faith. This book posits a viable account of theological rationality, justification, and knowledge that avoids the twin pitfalls of modern rationalism and postmodern irrationalism. Theology is freshly understood as a rigorous and rational truth-seeking discipline that seeks theoretical understanding of divine reality. Throughout the modern era the predominant epistemological position has been classical foundationalism, a position now widely rejected by philosophers and theologians alike. Philosophers recognize that it fails to achieve a plausible account of rationality, justification or knowledge, while theologians recognize the extent to which classical foundationalist strictures have distorted Christian doctrine. In its place many philosophers and theologians alike have adopted a nonfoundationalist epistemology, which is in turn often associated with a problematic alethic and metaphysical antirealism. Engaging with the ideas of key thinkers from Descartes, Locke, and Kant, to Bruce Marshall and Alvin Plantinga, Rauser provides an accessible and provocative survey of the theological terrain of the modern - and postmodern - era, arguing in favour of a return to a moderate foundationalism
|Keywords||Knowledge, Theory of (Religion Foundationalism (Theory of knowledge|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$128.31 new (5% off) $135.00 direct from Amazon $137.74 used Amazon page|
|Call number||BT50.R28 2009|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard Garrett (1991). Are There Foundations for Human Knowledge? Behavior and Philosophy 19 (2):19 - 33.
Thomas Guarino (1989). Foundationalism and Contemporary Theology. Philosophy and Theology 3 (3):241-252.
Paul K. Moser (1989). Knowledge and Evidence. Cambridge University Press.
Stanley Hauerwas (2007). The State of the University: Academic Knowledges and the Knowledge of God. Blackwell Pub..
Nikola Grahek (2003). Austin and the Very Idea of the Theory of Knowledge. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):145-153.
Jonathan L. Kvanvig (1986). The Confusion Over Foundationalism. Philosophia 16 (3-4):345-354.
Laurence BonJour & Ernest Sosa (2003). Epistemic Justification: Internalism Vs. Externalism, Foundations Vs. Virtues. Blackwell Pub..
Robert Audi (1993). The Structure of Justification. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-09-15
Total downloads8 ( #267,627 of 1,725,840 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,700 of 1,725,840 )
How can I increase my downloads?